ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Bar Review Chatboard

Hot Now...
Attorney Chat Center
Attorney Classifieds
Attorney Chatboards
Practice Areas
Law Students
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Classified Ads

Re: November 2005 MPRE
Posted by John Van Amburg on 11/13/07

    A agree with the original poster that the fact patterns seemed to
    be on the ambiguous edges of rules rather than straightforward. I
    often found myself weeding out two choices but having two viable
    choices left to deal with. And often one was a YES and the other
    a NO!

    On 11/09/05, Feel better now about MPRE.... wrote:
    > I'm glad someone else found the November MPRE difficult. I did
    > the BarBri review course and thought that I had looked at all
    > the possible type questions to the MPRE, but even this exam
    > stumped me!! Hope they scale our marks up!!
    >
    > I'm taking the LA bar in Feb so now I've got to concentrate on
    > that....
    >
    > On 11/04/05, NoWorries wrote:
    >> I took the MPRE today as well and I agree that it was
    >> tricky. But worry not, the passing raw score will be low
    >> this time as the unanimous voice I heard about the MPRE
    >> today was that it was hard. Let's just hope for the best.
    >> Oh, I agree with you for the rest of your posting.
    >>
    >>
    >> On 11/04/05, JoeStanley wrote:
    >>> I just took the MPRE, and I thought it was really
    >>> difficult. I've passed three bar exams on the first try
    >>> (NY, NJ & CT), but this last MPRE leaves me wondering if
    >>> I'll have to take it again. I've been practicing for 13
    >>> years in NY & NJ and took the July exam for Connecticut.
    >> I
    >>> studied for the MPRE and thought I knew the rules, but the
    >>> questions were all subtle gradations with a close choice
    >>> between two answers. I just want to rant a little: The
    >>> people who put this exam together are jerks. In the real
    >>> world you only have to know the basic rules, because if
    >> you
    >>> are faced with an ambiguous situation, you look up the
    >>> actual rule or call the jurisdictions' ethics hotline and
    >>> get an opinion. So they ought to be testing the basic
    >> rules
    >>> with straight forward fact patterns. This exam was full
    >> of
    >>> BS and if I flunked I'm gonna complain (as if it would do
    >>> any good). Anyway, that's my rant. Thanks for
    >>> listening. --Joe.

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.