Re: Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk
Posted by Curmudgeon on 5/27/08
About $5000 more than what you think is fair. On 5/27/08, Michael Collins wrote: > I was accused in 11/2002 by the Kirkland WA. Police > department of theft. The detective told me that if I left > the state of Washington the case would never go forward. > > I was formally charged without my knowledge in Aug 2004 > and of course there is a warrent for Theft I in King > County Washington Superior Court... > > My accuser since then is facing a 7+ Felony count > indictment by the US govt and is awaiting trial. In the > indictment is clearly states that "As defendant xxxx xxxx > knew, all of the documents described in > paragraph 5 were false and fraudulent because he > instructed defendant yyyyyy to create > those documents using false information supplied by > defendant xxxx. As defendant xxxxx > further knew, defendant yyyy created each of the false > documents using a personal computer at > company xyz." > > What is a reasonable fee for an atty to present all this > to the prosecutor's office and get this dropped?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk, 5/27/08, by Michael Collins.
- Re: Reasonable fee for apparent slam dunk, 5/27/08, by Curmudgeon.
|