Follow us!

    Re: Admissibility of Coerced confession

    Posted by Curmudgeon on 8/13/06

    You also had a constitutional right to a free public education-
    -including grammar and spelling. You obviously didn't
    exercise that right, either.

    On 8/13/06, Teri wrote:
    > On 12/28/05, Jeff wrote:
    >> To Jeff Does anyone have any thoughts on admissibility
    > of a
    >> confessed coerced during interrogation by Federal agenys?
    > Yes, part of the just-us system. You may look up cases where
    > a few honest Judges has up held maranda rights when
    > confessions has been coerced or forced. By decieving
    > practices and lies, or physical force --in which the
    > defendant is usually handcuffed and or 10 to one situation
    > where the victum-defendant is not in a position to fight
    > back. Cowardly as it is, it goes on all the time look at the
    > never ending law suits comming out of California in
    > Sacramento alone. Where also fALSE CONFESSIONS ARE OVER
    > LOOKED, EVEN ALLEGATIONS PERGURY BY POLICE OFFICERS EGNORED.
    > Not to mention cop happy judges who seem to promote this
    sort
    > of behavior. Even if in this seemingly backward town if a
    new
    > trial is permitted the prosecutor may-as they say- taint it
    > with mentioning the confession even after it was thrown out
    > for the purpose of having the jurors hear it and assume that
    > because IT WAS SAID IT MUST BE TRUE, not realizing the
    > circumstances of how it was obtained and getting a
    > conviction.It taught me that if I were a juror if I even
    > heard it was done in a deciving was or cohersed I would find
    > them not guilty and if people want to guard there rights
    they
    > perhaps sshold do the same until they get the message.Unless
    > we have enough honest lawers to fight for our constitutional
    > rights and jurors educated to this decieving practice, the
    > people we will be equal to a third world corrupt monarcy.
    > This could happen to anyone at any time. Michigan v. Tucker
    > (1974) Court reversed conviction. Don't seem too soon
    comming
    > to California especially if lawyers are fearfull of cop
    happy
    > Judges I have heard of and have seen myself. Judges who
    > recommend convictions based on false confessions even BEFORE
    > THE TRIAL> JURY TRIAL. JUST-US SYSTEM

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Admissibility of Coerced confession, 12/28/05, by Jeff.
  • Re: Admissibility of Coerced confession, 12/28/05, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: Admissibility of Coerced confession, 8/13/06, by Teri.
  • Re: Admissibility of Coerced confession, 8/13/06, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: Admissibility of Coerced confession, 10/20/06, by fred.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.