Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along...
Posted by -- on 12/11/07

On 12/11/07, Gary wrote:
> Check out this disgusting commentary in Forbes by Roger
> Haydock, the "Don Corleone" of the NAF-IA.
>
> http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/30/arbitrate-courts-debtors-
> oped-cx_rth_1031arbitrate.html

I would agree with him if he were talking about mandatory
non-binding arbitration that was truly impartial. It does
work well and with cost/fee penalties for a non-prevailing
party who elects to go to trial after arbitration it
provides an incentive to cooperate with a reasonable
arbitration decision.

However, from what I have herd on this forum, NAF is not
truly impartial and instead is a rubber stamp for the credit
card companies.

Posts on this thread, including this one

• And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/11/07, by Gary.
• Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/11/07, by --.
• Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/12/07, by Gary.