Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along...
Posted by -- on 12/11/07
On 12/11/07, Gary wrote: > Check out this disgusting commentary in Forbes by Roger > Haydock, the "Don Corleone" of the NAF-IA. > > http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/30/arbitrate-courts-debtors- > oped-cx_rth_1031arbitrate.html I would agree with him if he were talking about mandatory non-binding arbitration that was truly impartial. It does work well and with cost/fee penalties for a non-prevailing party who elects to go to trial after arbitration it provides an incentive to cooperate with a reasonable arbitration decision. However, from what I have herd on this forum, NAF is not truly impartial and instead is a rubber stamp for the credit card companies.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/11/07, by Gary.
- Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/11/07, by --.
- Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/12/07, by Gary.
|