Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along...
Posted by Gary on 12/12/07

...Nothing against impartial arbitration between two
consenting business parties of similar resources...

This enforced retail-level arbirtation, however, is criminally
inefficient as a tool for alternative dispute resolution.


On 12/11/07, -- wrote:
> On 12/11/07, Gary wrote:
>> Check out this disgusting commentary in Forbes by Roger
>> Haydock, the "Don Corleone" of the NAF-IA.
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/2007/10/30/arbitrate-courts-debtors-
>> oped-cx_rth_1031arbitrate.html
>
> I would agree with him if he were talking about mandatory
> non-binding arbitration that was truly impartial. It does
> work well and with cost/fee penalties for a non-prevailing
> party who elects to go to trial after arbitration it
> provides an incentive to cooperate with a reasonable
> arbitration decision.
>
> However, from what I have herd on this forum, NAF is not
> truly impartial and instead is a rubber stamp for the credit
> card companies.

Posts on this thread, including this one

• And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/11/07, by Gary.
• Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/11/07, by --.
• Re: And Haydock's NAF lies keep rolling along..., 12/12/07, by Gary.