Follow us!

    Post: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation

    Posted by Curious on 11/17/04


    Hi Hardy,

    What's this about? I found it in the LA Supreme Court
    Disciplinary Reports at www.ladb.org

    http://www.lasc.org/news_releases/1996/1996-116.asp

    FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

    On the 7th day of November, 1996, the following action was
    taken by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the case(s)
    listed below:

    96-B - 2491 IN RE: HARDY M. PARKERSON

    See Per Curiam

    WATSON, J. - not on panel.

    http://www.ladb.org/NXT/gateway.dll?
    f=templates&fn=default.htm

    SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
    NO. 96-B-2491
    IN RE: HARDY M. PARKERSON

    DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

    PER CURIAM

    ************************************************************
    ***************

    Respondent, Hardy M. Parkerson, was formally charged
    with engaging in misconduct contary to the Rules of
    Professional Conduct. Count I charged respondent with
    soliciting professional employment in person from persons
    with whom respondent did not have a family or prior
    professional relationship. Count I further charged that
    respondent's motive behind this solicitation was his own
    pecuniary gain. This solicitation violates Rules 7.2 (a),
    8.4 (a) and 8.4 (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
    Initially, respondent denied that he had violated any of
    the Rules of Professional Conduct. Subsequent to
    respondent's initial denial, respondent filed a Petition
    For Consent Discipline. In his Petition For Consent
    Discipline, respondent stated he could nat successfully
    defend against the charges against him. Respondent
    requested that he be suspended from the practice of law for
    a period of sixty (60) days, deferred subject to a one year
    period of probation, under the following terms and
    conditions: (1) Respondent shall not violate any of the
    Rules of Professional Conduct during the period of
    probation; (2) Respondent shall earn an additional three
    (3) hours of ethics over and above the customary fifteen
    (15) hours of continuing legal education required during
    the year 1996; (3) Respondent will accept the issuance of a
    Public Reprimand for the misconduct engaged in; (4)
    Respondent will issue a letter of apology directed to the
    Complainant who was solicited, acknowledging his misconduct
    and expressing his regret for the infraction and the harm
    which he has done to the public and. to the Bar; (5)
    Respondent shall make immediate and complete payment of all
    disciplinary costs assessed against him.

    Both the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board
    concurred with respondent's proposed consent discipline.
    According to the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary
    Board, respondent's proposed sanction is consistent with
    the gravity of the u. tense respondent is charged with.

    Upon review of the Hearing Committee and Disciplinary
    Board's findings and recommendations, and the record filed
    herein, and the seriousness of the offense that respondent
    is charged with, it is the decision of the Court that the
    proposed consent discipline be adopted.

    Accordingly, it is ordered that Hardy M. Parkerson be
    suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty
    (60 days), deferred subject to a one year period of
    probation under the following terms and conditions:

    1) Respondent shall not violate any of the Rules
    of Professional Conduct during the period
    of probation;

    2) Respondent shall earn an additional three (3)
    hours of ethics over and above the customary
    fifteen (15) hours of continuing legal education
    required during the year 1996;

    3) Respondent will accept the issuance of a Public
    Reprimand for the misconduct he engaged in;

    4) Respondent will issue a letter of apology
    directed to the Complainant who was
    solicited, acknowledging his misconduct
    and expressing his regret for the infraction and the harm
    which he has done to the public and to the
    Bar;

    5) Respondent shall make immediate and complete
    payment of all disciplinary costs assessed
    against him.

    DEFERRED SUSPENSION ORDERED

    Watson, J., not on panel. See Rule IV, Part 2, ' 3.

    End of Document



    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 11/17/04, by Curious.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 11/17/04, by chexndamail.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 11/17/04, by roosta.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 11/17/04, by Turtle.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 2/11/05, by Justin Thibodeaux, Unlicensed Attorney at Law.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 2/11/05, by Holy Smokes.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 2/11/05, by Helen Mouton.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 2/11/05, by J.T..
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 2/11/05, by Holy Smokes.
  • Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: client solicitation, 2/12/05, by chexndamail.
  • Re: THIS IS FIUNNY! - Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re: , 2/12/05, by Louis de ville Claverstone.
  • Re: THIS IS FIUNNY! - Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re:, 2/12/05, by Louia de ville Claverstone.
  • Re: THIS IS FIUNNY! - Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re:, 2/12/05, by Billy Treesling, J.D..
  • Re: THIS IS FUNNY! - Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re:, 2/12/05, by Texas Shyster.
  • Re: THIS IS FUNNY! - Re: Question for Hardy Parkerson re:, 2/12/05, by chexndamail.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.