Re: long-term document review?
Posted by rrr on 7/12/06
The pay is real, if not low. The work is going to be legal drudgery. Whether it will last 1-2 years is anyones guess. Think of it this way, 3 days of work will pay for your Bar dues and some beer. How can you go wrong? On 7/11/06, L wrote: > As you know, I closed my law office, and have decided to > beomce a teacher. I'm almost done with the process and > expect to receive job offers from schools. > > I had also decided to go inactive (law license), not pay > any more bar dues, and turn in my bar card. > > Suddenly, I get a call about a long-term document review > job paying $35/hr. The recruiter says it will be 1-2 > years long with some overtime, that I could make over $70k > a year. When I asked her if I must keep my law license > active, she says I must keep it active for this job. > Teaching jobs pay about $40k/year. > > 1) Do you think a doc review job is reliable enough that > I can count on 1-2 years of income at $70k/year+? > 2) Do you think doc review jobs really require active law > license? I thought even fresh grads without law licenses > worked on those gigs ... > > Keeping my license active will require about $500 I need > to pay very soon. I wonder if this doc gig is worth that > money and foregoing teaching position. If I go inactive I > just need to pay $50. >
Posts on this thread, including this one
- long-term document review?, 7/11/06, by L.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/12/06, by Martin.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/12/06, by rrr.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/12/06, by L.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/12/06, by Martin.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/12/06, by randy.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/13/06, by tx.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/13/06, by anon.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/13/06, by G.
- Re: long-term document review?, 7/16/06, by L.
- Re: long-term document review?, 8/01/06, by A. Gunn.
|