Re: Joe Stanley Writes Huh?
Posted by Curmudgeon on 11/05/05
If a name does not appear in the caption of the original complaint, or if it was not added by proper amendment after--and most important--if a person with that name was not served a summons directed to that name specifically--that name is not part of the lawsuit. No judgment can be entered against a person that was not served with a summons and complaint. On 11/05/05, TT wrote: > On 11/04/05, JoeStanley wrote: Huh? > > Is Joe Stanley an attorney. > > For anyone who reads this post, I think we all know, "huh?" > won't fly in the courtroom and I don't think there's a motion > called "huh?" > > Can anyone please offer an intelligent reponse?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Judgment: Straightening Out The Defendant's Names/Akas (CA) , 10/26/05, by TT.
- Re: Judgment: Straightening Out The Defendant's Names/Akas (, 11/04/05, by JoeStanley.
- Re: Joe Stanley Writes Huh? , 11/05/05, by TT.
- Re: Joe Stanley Writes Huh? , 11/05/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Joe Stanley Writes Huh? , 11/05/05, by TT.
- Re: Joe Stanley Writes Huh? , 11/05/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: ATTN: MODERATOR, 11/05/05, by TT.
- Re: ATTN: MODERATOR, 11/06/05, by v.
- Re: Judgment: Straightening Out The Defendant's Names/Akas (, 11/06/05, by ARealLawStudent.
- Re: Judgment: Straightening Out The Defendant's Names/Akas (, 11/07/05, by DC Attorney .
|