Re: Workman comp. Judge
Posted by bush hater on 5/18/05
On 5/16/05, ^ wrote: > On 5/16/05, Paula Hooper wrote: >> Back in Nov. 2002 I was injured at work. After 2 1/2 years >> my case was decided in under 4 hours. The Judge in my case >> would allow no testimony that would prove my case. He >> denied my claim. His denial was prewritten before case was >> started. He states before trial my case was mental stress. >> I had major back surgery. Two rods and four screws inserted >> in back. I had a doctor that slandered me in his >> deposition. Broke confidentialty between doctor patient. We >> are appealing. Filing medical malpratice and a civil suit. >> The claims adjuster statement was not allowed into evidence >> clearly showing that I reported injury. I worked for a >> state agency that is run by an elected official that was >> indicted on 21 counts that were all dismissed. I testified >> at the grand jury that caused his indictment. I was >> retaliated at work. Mental stress along with undue sciatic >> nerve problems caused my injury. My back popped and caused >> a severe burning along the lower back area. Said doctor >> along with a state doctor,primary care doctor and a social >> security judge stated that I was disabled on Nov. 4, 2002. >> But according to the W/C judge that was a lie. Is our >> judicial system one-sided? You bet. I feel all cases should >> be decided by the appeallete court. > > get an attorney and sue the bastards for defamation, mental > stress, denial of benefits, so on and so forth!!! I BET HE'S A FILTHY REPUBLICAN JUDGE!!!!!!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Workman comp. Judge, 5/16/05, by Paula Hooper.
- Re: Workman comp. Judge, 5/16/05, by ^.
- Re: Workman comp. Judge, 5/18/05, by bush hater.
- Re: Workman comp. Judge, 5/19/05, by Paula Hooper.
|