Re: Workman comp. Judge
Posted by Paula Hooper on 5/19/05
On 5/18/05, bush hater wrote: > On 5/16/05, ^ wrote: >> On 5/16/05, Paula Hooper wrote: >>> Back in Nov. 2002 I was injured at work. After 2 1/2 years >>> my case was decided in under 4 hours. The Judge in my case >>> would allow no testimony that would prove my case. He >>> denied my claim. His denial was prewritten before case was >>> started. He states before trial my case was mental stress. >>> I had major back surgery. Two rods and four screws inserted >>> in back. I had a doctor that slandered me in his >>> deposition. Broke confidentialty between doctor patient. We >>> are appealing. Filing medical malpratice and a civil suit. >>> The claims adjuster statement was not allowed into evidence >>> clearly showing that I reported injury. I worked for a >>> state agency that is run by an elected official that was >>> indicted on 21 counts that were all dismissed. I testified >>> at the grand jury that caused his indictment. I was >>> retaliated at work. Mental stress along with undue sciatic >>> nerve problems caused my injury. My back popped and caused >>> a severe burning along the lower back area. Said doctor >>> along with a state doctor,primary care doctor and a social >>> security judge stated that I was disabled on Nov. 4, 2002. >>> But according to the W/C judge that was a lie. Is our >>> judicial system one-sided? You bet. I feel all cases should >>> be decided by the appeallete court. >> >> get an attorney and sue the bastards for defamation, mental >> stress, denial of benefits, so on and so forth!!! > > I BET HE'S A FILTHY REPUBLICAN JUDGE!!!!!!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Workman comp. Judge, 5/16/05, by Paula Hooper.
- Re: Workman comp. Judge, 5/16/05, by ^.
- Re: Workman comp. Judge, 5/18/05, by bush hater.
- Re: Workman comp. Judge, 5/19/05, by Paula Hooper.
|