Re: unconscionable fees?
Posted by rrr on 10/09/06
Thats a weird definition of "nuisance case" saying something is a nuissance case after the fact based on the amount of settlement. A case where $15000 to $50,000 is at issue is pretty meaningful to the average person. However, just because $50,000 is at issue doesn't mean a case is worth $50,000, or even $15,000, or anything for that matter. A client may think they were wrongfully deprived of $50,000 and the facts may show no liability. I don't think you have a meaningful point, you just seem to want to slander the legal profession. On 10/02/06, secretary wrote: > I'll say a case that settles for $1,500.00 -- $5,000.00 where at least 10 times > that amount is at issue. > > On 9/28/06, rrr wrote: >> secretary wrote: >>> What percentage of cases do you think on average turn out to be nuisance >> cases >>> in a typical caseload? >> >> Define "nuisance case" in a meaningful manner. >>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- unconscionable fees?, 9/24/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/24/06, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/24/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/24/06, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/24/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/26/06, by Ozarks Lawyer.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/26/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/26/06, by rrr.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/28/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/28/06, by Carol.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/28/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 9/28/06, by rrr.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 10/02/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 10/09/06, by rrr.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 10/10/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 10/10/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 10/23/06, by secretary.
- Re: unconscionable fees?, 3/22/07, by sergei.
|