Re: unconscionable fees?

More | Report Post

On 10/09/06, rrr wrote:
> Thats a weird definition of "nuisance case" saying something is a nuissance case
> after the fact based on the amount of settlement. A case where $15000 to $50,000
> is at issue is pretty meaningful to the average person. However, just because
> $50,000 is at issue doesn't mean a case is worth $50,000, or even $15,000, or
> anything for that matter. A client may think they were wrongfully deprived of
> $50,000 and the facts may show no liability.
>
> I don't think you have a meaningful point, you just seem to want to slander the
> legal profession.
>
> On 10/02/06, secretary wrote:
>> I'll say a case that settles for $1,500.00 -- $5,000.00 where at least 10 times
>> that amount is at issue.
>>
>> On 9/28/06, rrr wrote:
>>> secretary wrote:
>>>> What percentage of cases do you think on average turn out to be nuisance
>>> cases
>>>> in a typical caseload?
>>>
>>> Define "nuisance case" in a meaningful manner.
>>>