Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice
Posted by Rob on 3/10/06
My fee was a standard Chapter 7 is now $1,400.00 My fee for a standard Chapter 13 is now $2,250.00. I did not find JF's fees to be outreageous at all. Frankly, almost every solo I know makes a comfortable living. They work their ass off, but they make it. Just like every other business, you have to be willing to work. On 3/09/06, JF wrote: > You have made some erroneous assumptions. I do not bs, please do not > make unfounded accusations. > > I never said I "switched" to bankruptcy from real estate. I do not go > where the action is hot. I added bankruptcy to my practice because it > was something I did earlier in my career, something I was familiar > with (despite the new rules). Look at my posts for the past year or > so; I advocate concentration in a primary area, supplemented by > secondary areas. I practice what I preach, and my primary area is real > estate. I was able to practice almost all real estate for the past six > or seven years, but since real estate dropped off, I added bankruptcy > as a supplement (in addition to wills & trusts). Bankruptcy is not, > and never will be, my primary area. > > Regarding the means test, it is you who are incorrect. All debtors ARE > subject to the means test. The ones who fall below the state's median > income pass the means test. The ones who are above the median income > fail the means test. Please look up the law before you make your > attacks. > > The reason why I pass what you call the "smell test" is within your > uninformed post. Yes, many attorneys in my community have discontinued > bankruptcy practice, as they have nationwide. This has helped my > practice, because many of these attorneys remembered me as someone who > used to do quite a bit of bankruptcy. Who do you think they're > referring their cases to? Yes, bankruptcy filings are down, but so are > the amount of bankruptcy attorneys. Less attorneys, less filings equal > about the same amount of work for the attorneys who still practice > bankruptcy. > > I never said that I don't advertise (another false assumption on your > part). I receive referral work from several bar associations. I also > receive work (albeit at a discounted rate) from legal insurance > programs. > > I don't know why you suggest that I become a cop. I'm not the one > screaming about my failure at solo practice. I take it as an attempt > by you to throw me a jab, but I don't know why you see the need to > insult me. Whether you agree with my posts or not, I have made an > effort to share my experiences on this chatboard, and I have looked > for the same from others. > > Frankly, I'm assuming you're a young lawyer who has some growing up to > do. Good luck. > > > On 3/09/06, Guru wrote: >> JF, >> >> You are incorrect that all debtors are subjected to the means test. >> Only debtors who make above their state's median income are subjected >> to the means test. I would think you would know that, since you are >> one of the few bankruptcy attorneys who are filing. >> >> You say that you switch practice and go where the action is hot. > Now, >> what were you thinking when you went from real estate practice to >> bankruptcy practice just after the law changed? Why did you decide > to >> get into bankruptcy at exactly the worst time? >> >> I find it odd that an attorney specializing in real estate would >> switch to bankruptcy at a most innopportune time, and then be able to >> file several cases a month, at an unusually high fee, while doing no >> bankruptcy advertising, just getting cases by referral. It does not >> pass the smell test. >> >> Also, you said recently that cops make $200,000 a year. Have you >> considered joining them? >> >> P.S. >> >> No more bs, please. >> >> On 3/09/06, rrr wrote: >>> Ok, now I'm interested... >>> >>> On 3/09/06, JF wrote: >>> >>>>> - The income required to pass the means test is not that >>>> low, usually in the mid 50s. Clients come up with the money, >>>> usually becaue they stop paying their credit card bills. >>>> Sometimes relatives pay, which I of course disclose to the court. >>> >>> Its mid $50 for a Couple. I was running the numbers and it looks >>> like 24K for an individual. Or am I running the numbers wrong? >>> >>>>>> What does your fee agreement say about additional costs in >>>>> bankruptcy, for things such as lift stay defense, discharge >>>>> objections, etc.? >>>> - My standard fee agreement calls for hourly fees for the >>>> above, but frankly, I would not expect to get paid for those >>>> services. Clients would not have the money, and most judges >>>> would not let me out of the case. Sooner or later I will have to >>>> bite the bullet and perform one or more of these services for >>>> free (part of the cost o >> >> f doing business). >>> >>> I thinks thats going to vary by Court. In our district... for >>> Chapter 7's all of those things were extra, for Chapter 13's you >>> were stuck. Your only remedy was to seek additional compensation >>> from the plan. So in theory if there was any money you would get >>> paid by screwing the unsecureds. The question is always what will >>> the court view as just compensation in these situations. >>> >>>>> What percentage of your clients get subjected to the means >>>>> test, and of that number, how many pass? >>>> -All clients face the means test. About two thirds of my >>>> new clients have passed; where the clients have not passed, I am >>>> reviewing the feasibility of arguing for an exception to the >>>> means test. Otherwise, I'll file a 13. >>> >>> Exception to the Feasibility test? How does that work? >>> >>> >>> >>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/08/06, by Guru.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/08/06, by JF.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/08/06, by Guru.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/08/06, by L.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/08/06, by Guru.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/09/06, by JF.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/09/06, by rrr.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/09/06, by Guru.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/09/06, by JF.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/09/06, by FordhamGrad.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, Guru, 3/09/06, by L.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, Guru, 3/10/06, by FordhamGrad.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, Guru, 3/10/06, by Guru.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice JF, 3/10/06, by Guru.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice JF, 3/10/06, by JF.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice JF, 3/10/06, by Bob R/CA.
- Re: Bankruptcy and Solo Practice, 3/10/06, by Rob.
|