Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu
Posted by Egon on 11/29/06
Get lost. On 11/29/06, Carl Jackson wrote: > On 11/29/06, Bobs Biff wrote: >> Your message was designed to drive traffic and a higher >> google ranking to the website you linked to. As such, your >> post was not sincere and will not get a serious response. >> > > Whoops, I didn't mean to do that at all. I didn't think I > was "linking" to another website by posting the address in the > message. I am very sorry about all that. Consider that part > of my original posting scratched, but the rest of it sincere. > Why would I bother to type so much about my situation if I > wasn't sincere. > > Thanks, > > C.J.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, but..., 11/28/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Bobs Biff.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Egon.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/29/06, by Smith.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by Smith.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 11/30/06, by Carl Jackson.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 12/01/06, by rrr.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 12/08/06, by kristi.
- Re: Startup costs of my own practice are not the problem, bu, 12/08/06, by JF.
|