Follow us!

    Re: Miranda rights

    Posted by Micheal Shea on 11/06/03

    On 11/02/03, Miranda wrote:
    > Police have no obligation to read Miranda rights after
    > arresting a subject. None.
    >
    > If they don't, they can't use the subject's statements against
    > him in court. Thus under current case law, Miranda is merely
    > an evidentiary rule.
    >
    > One common technique police use, which is legal under current
    > case law, is to question a subject in custody without
    > Mirandizing him, then Mirandize him and ask him the same
    > questions again.
    >
    > The first round of statements are not admissable in court.
    > The second set of statements are.
    >
    > Because a subject who has not been Mirandized and has
    > confessed already feels he has confessed, he is often willing
    > to confess again after being Mirandized.
    But the Police have to give Miranda rights if charged with a
    felony?

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • meranda rights, 11/01/03, by john doe.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/01/03, by sharwinston.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/02/03, by Miranda.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/06/03, by Micheal Shea.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 3/05/04, by CLB.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 3/10/04, by CBL.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Ozarks Lawyer.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
  • Re: Miranda rights, 11/24/04, by SFanua.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoardsm. All Rights Reserved.