Re: Miranda rights
Posted by Micheal Shea on 11/06/03
On 11/02/03, Miranda wrote: > Police have no obligation to read Miranda rights after > arresting a subject. None. > > If they don't, they can't use the subject's statements against > him in court. Thus under current case law, Miranda is merely > an evidentiary rule. > > One common technique police use, which is legal under current > case law, is to question a subject in custody without > Mirandizing him, then Mirandize him and ask him the same > questions again. > > The first round of statements are not admissable in court. > The second set of statements are. > > Because a subject who has not been Mirandized and has > confessed already feels he has confessed, he is often willing > to confess again after being Mirandized. But the Police have to give Miranda rights if charged with a felony?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- meranda rights, 11/01/03, by john doe.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/01/03, by sharwinston.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/02/03, by Miranda.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/06/03, by Micheal Shea.
- Re: Miranda rights, 3/05/04, by CLB.
- Re: Miranda rights, 3/10/04, by CBL.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Ozarks Lawyer.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/23/04, by Dee48.
- Re: Miranda rights, 11/24/04, by SFanua.
|