Post: judicial misconduct
Posted by nottoobright on 4/05/09
Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by the silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.) Judge consults the other side for clarification on admissibility and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit, the opponent and no response is permitted. How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet silence boy?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by nottoobright.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 7/14/09, by richard ford.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.
|