Follow us!

    Post: judicial misconduct

    Posted by nottoobright on 4/05/09


    Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of
    law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a
    judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to
    the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not
    before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by the
    silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.) Judge
    consults the other side for clarification on admissibility
    and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false
    information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge
    without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit, the
    opponent and no response is permitted.
    How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet
    silence boy?

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by nottoobright.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 7/14/09, by richard ford.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.