Re: judicial misconduct

More | Report Post

On 4/05/09, Curmudgeon wrote:
> Your name says it all.
>
> On 4/05/09, nottoobright wrote:
>> Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of
>> law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a
>> judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to
>> the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not
>> before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by
> the
>> silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.)
> Judge
>> consults the other side for clarification on admissibility
>> and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false
>> information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge
>> without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit,
> the
>> opponent and no response is permitted.
>> How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet
>> silence boy?