Re: judicial misconduct
Posted by Curmudgeon on 4/05/09
Your name says it all. On 4/05/09, nottoobright wrote: > Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of > law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a > judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to > the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not > before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by the > silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.) Judge > consults the other side for clarification on admissibility > and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false > information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge > without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit, the > opponent and no response is permitted. > How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet > silence boy?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by nottoobright.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 7/14/09, by richard ford.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.
- Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.
|