Follow us!

    Re: judicial misconduct

    Posted by Curmudgeon on 4/05/09

    Your name says it all.

    On 4/05/09, nottoobright wrote:
    > Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of
    > law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a
    > judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to
    > the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not
    > before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by
    the
    > silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.)
    Judge
    > consults the other side for clarification on admissibility
    > and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false
    > information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge
    > without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit,
    the
    > opponent and no response is permitted.
    > How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet
    > silence boy?

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by nottoobright.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by Curmudgeon.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 7/14/09, by richard ford.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.
  • Re: judicial misconduct, 7/26/10, by against the wind.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.