Re: judicial misconduct
Posted by Curmudgeon on 4/05/09

Your name says it all.

On 4/05/09, nottoobright wrote:
> Do you think it is unlikely that a novice to the world of
> law, lawsuits and courtroom procedure could sense when a
> judge and a couple of lawyers are not playing fair? Add to
> the equation one side is allowed to talk about matters not
> before the court, and the other may not. Every Motion by
the
> silenced party is denied (And there were quite a few.)
Judge
> consults the other side for clarification on admissibility
> and relevance. Judge cautions based on that false
> information. The silenced side is threatened by the judge
> without evidence. The other side lies about the lawsuit,
the
> opponent and no response is permitted.
> How likely are you to side with the veterans vs keep quiet
> silence boy?

Posts on this thread, including this one

• judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by nottoobright.
• Re: judicial misconduct, 4/05/09, by Curmudgeon.
• Re: judicial misconduct, 7/14/09, by richard ford.