Re: Child Support Enforcement is a Violation of Men's Rights

More | Report Post

On 3/27/02, Darin wrote:
> How can you make a man legally responsible for child
> support when he isn't physically bond by flesh as the woman
> is? This is a violation of his 14th amendment right to be
> secure in his person, by adding more to his person than he
> is legally responsible for. The woman liberates a part of
> herself at the birth of the child. This can be
> scientifically proven via visual confirmation of the birth.
>
> Roe vs. Wade established that the child is the woman's
> body, not the man's. This excludes any legal
> responsibility man has to the child. A man has the right
> to be secure in his person, just as the woman does. Women
> were allowed the use of this right in order to terminate an
> individual after conception, on the basis that the
> individual does not exist, and that all of the physical
> matter surrounding this potential individual is her body to
> do with as she pleases. This, so called, fact excludes the
> existence of man's body within the woman, and therefor at
> no point can a man's body be reintroduced into the equation
> of the individual's existence, because no physical union
> between the man and the born/unborn individual can be
> scientifically measured. Even DNA cannot prove this
> existence WITHOUT simultaneously AFFIRMING conceptual level
> association, at which point the MURDER of men's children
> could be establish at a genocidal level in our society.
> This then concludes that at no point in the individual's
> existence does the man have any physical responsibility to
> external flesh. Failing to recognize the individual's
> existence at conception, has definitely cause a great
> problem in civilization, hasn't it? All for the rights of
> a WOMAN! The BIG VICTIMS! Victimhood has produce a new
> kind of victim. The victim of the victim. Our Government
> was designed and established to do ONE thing, PROTECT THE
> RIGHTS AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE VIA THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
> FREEDOM, INCLUDING MEN'S! My advice to our wonderful
> Government is to get out of our relationships before it has
> more than it can deal with.

Good work Darin. I know you have been attacked by many on
this board for your views, but just remember the
abolitionists were attacked by those who supported slavery,
and after all, child support is a form of reproductive
slavery. My personal favorite statement is that men have
choices, condom or abstention. So why does this make a man
responsible. A woman has the same choices prior to sex, the
pill or abstention. However, only the woman has choices
after conception. It takes two to have sex, but only one to
have a child. If the woman doesn't want the child, but the
man does, she has the option of abortion and the man can say
nothing. If the man doesn't want the child, but the woman
does, the man must pay. This does violate the Equal
Protection of the Laws doctrine. I am currently writing a
paper on this issue for a law school journal. Stay strong
Darin in the face of this feminazi world view and someday
male slavery too will be abolished.

Re: Child Support Enforcement is a Violation of Men's Rights, 12/30/11, by Matt schilling.

Equal Rights Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST