Re: The Official Word from DETC Regarding ALU

More | Report Post

On 1/22/09, Henry wrote:
> In looking at the DETC website, it looks like very few
> applicants become accredited. A rough calculation looks like
> less than a third.
>
> Henry
>
>
> On 1/22/09, David wrote:
>> If you take the time to read the previous post you will see
>> that it does not claim that ALU was denied accreditation. It
>> says pretty much the same thing that you write. (And the
>> quote is accurate.)
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/09, That email was NOT from DETC official wrote:
>>> Dumie,
>>>
>>> ALU has NOT been denied accrediation and
>>> anyone posting here saying that is wrong.
>>>
>>> We wont know for several more months, at
>>> the lastest it is a June 2009 notification
>>> on their website.
>>>
>>> On 1/22/09, David wrote:
>>>> I received the following e-mail this morning from DETC's
>>>> Director of Accreditation regarding Lincoln...
>>>>
>>>> "The statement that DETC would guarantee accreditation to
>>>> any applicant is ludicrous in the extreme. Where do people
>>>> come up with these claims? Besides, the use of the
>>>> word “guarantee” is verboten in the DETC Business
>>>> Standards."
>>>>
>>>> This does not mean that ALU will not be accredited at some
>>>> point in time in the future. It just means that the
>>>> persons or persons writing on this board that "its a done
>>>> deal" or its "guaranteed" are not providing accurate
>>>> information.