Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute
Posted by Curmudgeon on 7/27/05
Huh??? On 7/27/05, David A. DeBra wrote: > Is there a loss of priviledge ( protection) that an > attorney has if in the course of an action the attorney is > placed on notice ( AMONISHED) that the use of a libelous > AKA monikier should be refrained in usage and after such > announcement the libel AKA is continued. Does an affidavit > that uses the AKA libel also gain priviledge as a work > product ??
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute, 7/27/05, by David A. DeBra.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute, 7/27/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/28/05, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/29/05, by v.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/29/05, by Curmudgeon.
|