Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *
Posted by v on 7/29/05
I thin some body found the post-it notes stash. On 7/28/05, M'sta Mikey wrote: > On 7/27/05, Curmudgeon wrote: >> Huh??? >> >> On 7/27/05, David A. DeBra wrote: >>> Is there a loss of priviledge ( protection) that an >>> attorney has if in the course of an action the attorney is >>> placed on notice ( AMONISHED) that the use of a libelous >>> AKA monikier should be refrained in usage and after such >>> announcement the libel AKA is continued. Does an affidavit >>> that uses the AKA libel also gain priviledge as a work >>> product ?? > > Is this judicial pig-latin? Klown Kolledge didn't offer this > course and I feel I may be at a disadvantage...LOL
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute, 7/27/05, by David A. DeBra.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute, 7/27/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/28/05, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/29/05, by v.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/29/05, by Curmudgeon.
|