Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *
Posted by Curmudgeon on 7/29/05
I left all the post-it notes in the custody of the Dean of the Blakstone Klown Kollege of Law. I think he's been selling them on the black market to fund all those grants for felons. On 7/29/05, v wrote: > I thin some body found the post-it notes stash. > > > > On 7/28/05, M'sta Mikey wrote: >> On 7/27/05, Curmudgeon wrote: >>> Huh??? >>> >>> On 7/27/05, David A. DeBra wrote: >>>> Is there a loss of priviledge ( protection) that an >>>> attorney has if in the course of an action the attorney is >>>> placed on notice ( AMONISHED) that the use of a libelous >>>> AKA monikier should be refrained in usage and after such >>>> announcement the libel AKA is continued. Does an affidavit >>>> that uses the AKA libel also gain priviledge as a work >>>> product ?? >> >> Is this judicial pig-latin? Klown Kolledge didn't offer this >> course and I feel I may be at a disadvantage...LOL
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute, 7/27/05, by David A. DeBra.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute, 7/27/05, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/28/05, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/29/05, by v.
- Re: Is "prviledge" claimed by a lawyer absolute *Mudge *, 7/29/05, by Curmudgeon.
|