Re: US mail tampering
Posted by pat on 10/16/06
Thank you. But I would still like to see the legal basis/citation if anyone out there knows where to find it. On 10/11/06, M'sta Mikey wrote: > > Pat, the postal inspector is correct; if it arrives at your former > employer's address, it's their property. Go to the post office and > inquire as to why your mail is still being delivered to their address > and request, in person, that it be changed.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- US mail tampering, 11/03/05, by Jason.
- Re: US mail tampering, 11/04/05, by G. venkatachalam.
- Re: US mail tampering, 11/22/05, by Sean.
- Re: US mail tampering, 7/09/06, by Falcon.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/10/06, by MG.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/10/06, by pat.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/11/06, by v.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/11/06, by pat.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/11/06, by M'sta Mikey.
- Re: US mail tampering, 10/16/06, by pat.
- Re: US mail tampering, 12/08/06, by Anne Nelson.
- Re: US mail tampering, 1/14/07, by stephaniee.
- Re: US mail tampering, 1/20/07, by Jory.
- Re: US mail tampering, 3/01/07, by Kent.
- Re: US mail tampering, 3/21/07, by Nickie.
- Re: US mail tampering, 3/22/07, by Elonza Hart.
- Re: US mail tampering, 7/06/09, by Cindy.
- Re: US mail tampering, 7/06/09, by Cindy.
|