Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition
Posted by sharwinston on 2/27/05
If your choice, then, is to keep your attorney who, by your very words, "doesn't offer much hope or reassurance," then you get what you get. My$0.02: There's a whole lot more to this story than you've posted. On 2/27/05, sjklevickis wrote: > That is a terrifying notion. After telephone conversations with > many in my county (Santa Clara), I was able to ascertain on short > order that roughly 98&37; of them were unwilling to take a case in > Placer County--where this petition originated. {Home turf issue} > > Now that it's actually begun, my attorney said recently that it's > the most contensious case my he has ever had (many years in family > and civil law). I was hoping it was a "style" issue, rather than > any sort of incompetence, in terms of his not providing much > reassurance. Eeek. > >> On 2/27/05, sharwinston wrote: >> Then you need a new attorney ASAP. >
Posts on this thread, including this one
- third party non-custodial guardianship petition--no merit, 2/27/05, by sjklevickis.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sharwinston.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sjklevickis.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sharwinston.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sjklevickis.
- Re: third party non-custodial guardianship petition, 2/27/05, by sharwinston.
|