Re: Relevance?
Posted by sharwinston on 7/01/04
Mr. R. Oosta, Mine was an interrogatory inquring of Mr. Parkerson why he posted his political op-ed on this counsel.net Business Law chatboard? And, I, again, ask the question of him: What is the relevance of his post to this chatboard? On 7/01/04, roosta wrote: > On 7/01/04, sharwinston wrote: > What, if any, is the relevance of your post to this board? > Madame Winston,upon reviewing the original post, I find NO > claim to relevance. Just as your post makes NO claim to > relevance. LOL I think OP was trying to encourage others to > dialogue with the President and circumvent his having to depend > on attorneys for business advice. Your objection is over---- > whelmed. Good Dayyyy
Posts on this thread, including this one
- BUSH IS RUNNING SCARED; GETS OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICE, 6/30/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICES, 7/01/04, by roosta.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by roosta.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by Michael.
- Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by August Boudreaux.
- Re: Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by roosta.
- Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by Mel Steinmetz.
- Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by v.
|