Follow us!

    Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***

    Posted by August Boudreaux on 7/02/04

    Mon cher, when you type the word Cajun, please Capitalize it. We
    Cajuns are proud of our name and heritage.

    Thanks!

    August Boudreax
    Bayou LaFourche

    On 7/02/04, Michael wrote:
    > On 7/01/04, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> Dear Counsel.Net Friends,
    >>
    >> Someone asked the relevance of my posting about the price of
    >> gasoline to either Counsel.Net, or to the Business Law section of
    >> Counsel.Net. The answer is that down here in South Louisiana we
    >> are right in the big middle of the oil-patch, as well as the
    >> stepping-off point for off-shore exploration and production. The
    >> higher the price of oil and gasoline go, the more exploration and
    >> production take place. Can't explore and produce oil without oil
    >> and gas lawyers to examine titles, draw leases and divison orders,
    >> among other things, and to litigate mineral rights. Only place to
    >> post such information relating to oil and gas law, as I saw it,
    >> was on the Business Law section of Counsel.Net. As for
    >> communicating with Bush about the oil and gas industry, Bush has
    >> roots deep in Southwest Louisiana, as his father was once
    >> president of Zapata-Haynie, headquartered in Cameron, the number
    >> one fishing port in the Nation and the mouth of the Calcasieu Ship
    >> Channel leading to the biggest petro-chemical complex in the
    >> world. Bush knows us Cajuns and listens to us. That's why we want
    >> him to keep lowering the price of gasoline before the election.
    >> As Carville would say, "It's the price of gasoline, stupid!" Bush
    >> sees that, and he's listening to what I told him, and that is to
    >> get the oil companies to lower the price of gasoline before the
    >> election. It dropped ten cents just last week, and continues to
    >> drop. Of course, once Bush wins re-election, it's pay back time
    >> for the oil companies; and the price of gasoline will soar to
    >> $3.00 a gallon in a few weeks following the election. If he does
    >> not get the price down, which I am sure he will, it's all over for
    >> him. Of course, we do not want to lose him. As I say, he listens
    >> to us Cajuns, for he has roots deep in Southwest Louisiana. Why
    >> do you think Cheney and Scalia came down here duck-hunting
    >> recently? Bush has been here too.
    >>
    >> Sincerely,
    >>
    >> Hardy Parkerson, Atty.
    >> Oil and Gas Attorney
    >> (among other things)
    >> Lake Charles and New Orleans
    >>
    >
    > Mr. Parkerson,
    >
    > OK, let me see if I have this correct - The current price of
    gasoline
    > is now averaging about $2.07 per gallon and Mr. Bush "got" a 10-cent
    > per gallon price reduction. HOWEVER, if he is re-elected, prices are
    > expected, as you stated in your post, to rise upwards to $3.00 per
    > gallon!
    >
    > So sir, let me ask - Why would his "actions" encourage us to re-
    elect
    > him when, in the long run, it's going to cost us? Also, why do we
    > not "want to lose him"? It's obvious that this yo-yo game of oil
    > prices is going to cost us MORE in the long run, especially with
    Bush
    > in office and by him listening to you "cajuns". I fail to see the
    > logic of Mr. Bush's actions or, as sharwinston stated,
    > the "relevance" of your post; It's contradictory and the logic fails
    > to hold water (ooops, oil).

    Posts on this thread, including this one
  • BUSH IS RUNNING SCARED; GETS OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICE, 6/30/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
  • Re: OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICES, 7/01/04, by roosta.
  • Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
  • Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by roosta.
  • Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
  • Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
  • Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by Michael.
  • Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by August Boudreaux.
  • Re: Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by roosta.
  • Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by Mel Steinmetz.
  • Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by v.


  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.