Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***
Posted by August Boudreaux on 7/02/04
Mon cher, when you type the word Cajun, please Capitalize it. We Cajuns are proud of our name and heritage. Thanks! August Boudreax Bayou LaFourche On 7/02/04, Michael wrote: > On 7/01/04, Hardy Parkerson, Atty. wrote: >> >> >> Dear Counsel.Net Friends, >> >> Someone asked the relevance of my posting about the price of >> gasoline to either Counsel.Net, or to the Business Law section of >> Counsel.Net. The answer is that down here in South Louisiana we >> are right in the big middle of the oil-patch, as well as the >> stepping-off point for off-shore exploration and production. The >> higher the price of oil and gasoline go, the more exploration and >> production take place. Can't explore and produce oil without oil >> and gas lawyers to examine titles, draw leases and divison orders, >> among other things, and to litigate mineral rights. Only place to >> post such information relating to oil and gas law, as I saw it, >> was on the Business Law section of Counsel.Net. As for >> communicating with Bush about the oil and gas industry, Bush has >> roots deep in Southwest Louisiana, as his father was once >> president of Zapata-Haynie, headquartered in Cameron, the number >> one fishing port in the Nation and the mouth of the Calcasieu Ship >> Channel leading to the biggest petro-chemical complex in the >> world. Bush knows us Cajuns and listens to us. That's why we want >> him to keep lowering the price of gasoline before the election. >> As Carville would say, "It's the price of gasoline, stupid!" Bush >> sees that, and he's listening to what I told him, and that is to >> get the oil companies to lower the price of gasoline before the >> election. It dropped ten cents just last week, and continues to >> drop. Of course, once Bush wins re-election, it's pay back time >> for the oil companies; and the price of gasoline will soar to >> $3.00 a gallon in a few weeks following the election. If he does >> not get the price down, which I am sure he will, it's all over for >> him. Of course, we do not want to lose him. As I say, he listens >> to us Cajuns, for he has roots deep in Southwest Louisiana. Why >> do you think Cheney and Scalia came down here duck-hunting >> recently? Bush has been here too. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Hardy Parkerson, Atty. >> Oil and Gas Attorney >> (among other things) >> Lake Charles and New Orleans >> > > Mr. Parkerson, > > OK, let me see if I have this correct - The current price of gasoline > is now averaging about $2.07 per gallon and Mr. Bush "got" a 10-cent > per gallon price reduction. HOWEVER, if he is re-elected, prices are > expected, as you stated in your post, to rise upwards to $3.00 per > gallon! > > So sir, let me ask - Why would his "actions" encourage us to re- elect > him when, in the long run, it's going to cost us? Also, why do we > not "want to lose him"? It's obvious that this yo-yo game of oil > prices is going to cost us MORE in the long run, especially with Bush > in office and by him listening to you "cajuns". I fail to see the > logic of Mr. Bush's actions or, as sharwinston stated, > the "relevance" of your post; It's contradictory and the logic fails > to hold water (ooops, oil).
Posts on this thread, including this one
- BUSH IS RUNNING SCARED; GETS OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICE, 6/30/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: OIL COMPANIES TO DROP GAS PRICES, 7/01/04, by roosta.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by roosta.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by sharwinston.
- Re: Relevance?, 7/01/04, by Hardy Parkerson, Atty..
- Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by Michael.
- Re: Relevance? ** There ain't none ***, 7/02/04, by August Boudreaux.
- Re: Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by roosta.
- Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by Mel Steinmetz.
- Re: FUNNY! - Relevance? ** There tain't none for cajones***, 7/02/04, by v.
|