Re: Starbuck's ruling
Posted by Martha on 4/25/08
On 4/25/08, George wrote: > .... > Isn't it fraud to deceive consumers into a false perception that > they have no right to determine, for themselves, who should > receive their tip and what amount that person should receive? > > Isn't that exactly what tip jars do? > Yes. No.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Starbuck's ruling, 4/22/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/22/08, by Ann.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/23/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/23/08, by Ann.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/24/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/24/08, by Ann.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by Martha.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 5/09/08, by sharwinston.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 5/27/08, by George.
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 6/03/08, by George .
- Re: Starbuck's ruling, 6/04/08, by sharwinston.
|