Re: Starbuck's ruling
Posted by Martha on 4/25/08

On 4/25/08, George wrote:
> ....
> Isn't it fraud to deceive consumers into a false perception that
> they have no right to determine, for themselves, who should
> receive their tip and what amount that person should receive?
>
> Isn't that exactly what tip jars do?
>

Yes.

No.

Posts on this thread, including this one

• Starbuck's ruling, 4/22/08, by George.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/22/08, by Ann.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/23/08, by George.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/23/08, by Ann.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/24/08, by George.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/24/08, by Ann.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by George.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by George.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 4/25/08, by Martha.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 5/09/08, by sharwinston.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 5/27/08, by George.
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 6/03/08, by George .
• Re: Starbuck's ruling, 6/04/08, by sharwinston.