Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007
Posted by would-be solo on 1/05/07
On 1/03/07, rrr wrote: > On 1/02/07, Carol wrote: >> On 12/31/06, rrr wrote: >>> Its a Lawyer thing, you wouldn't understand. >> >> LOL. Best of luck to you. I for one will be interested in how >> it pans out for you. Intermediary between firm and solo sounds >> like the optimal blend, let someone else worry about the >> overhead but you're not a slave to those billable hours. >> > > I'm going to do updates periodically. My big worry is that when > push comes to shove, we won't be able to come to an agreement on > the financial mechanics of integrating my clients into the firm. > Existing Non-litigation work is easy, since you never really have > to bring it in to the office, but new clients with litigation files > just seem more likely to cause trouble. I'm also going to > experiment with the virtual office thing. > > > Do they let you use their office space when you are working on your own work for your own clients (even if you don't bring them into office)? If so, that sounds like an optimal arrangement and I wish I had that available to me. Well, there was an attorney in my area advertising for a part-time associate but he was only offering $18/hour. No thank you.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/31/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Carol.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/03/07, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/05/07, by would-be solo.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/06/07, by rrr.
|