Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007
Posted by Dejnave on 12/30/06
I don't get it. You post about how this profession almost ruined your life and now you come back for more. Why? On 12/30/06, rrr wrote: > An Update for the non-trolls... > > So after mulling it over, I've decided to go back to > Practice. I didn't want to go solo so I started looking > for an Attorney Job. As I started looking, I started > running into solos and small firms that were interested in > a part-time addition but not full time. So now I am working > as a part -timer. Which suits me fine for now. > Compensation... $40 per hour billed. I use their office, > their computers, their printers, etc. while working on > their work. > > If the chemistry is right, it might be useful to work out > some kind of arrangement where I bring in work to the firm > and give them a percentage to pay for overhead used. > Haven't thought through the percentage yet. I'm going to > scope out office suites in the general area to see what my > minimal overhead would be if I went solo. > > Technically, I'm not sure if this is "going solo", I think > its mediary between being an Associate for a Firm, and > being Solo. > > At this point I don't have any particular marketing plan, > but then again I have no overhead. > > > > > > >
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/30/06, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 12/31/06, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Carol.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/02/07, by Dejnave.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/03/07, by rrr.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/05/07, by would-be solo.
- Re: Quasi-Solo for 2007, 1/06/07, by rrr.
|