Re: Child Support

More | Report Post

Hi Sharwinston,

thanks for your response.

Consequences for providing the child support office with a
null and voided birth certificate with her maiden name listed
as child's last name and not with the birth certificate where
the child has the last name of her husband's and signature of
husband listed as the child's bio-father.

I understand that as biodad he is legally responsible for
taking care of the child. I agree with you 100 percent.
However, and my apologies for not including this prior. Biomom
decided to place un-biodad (husband) on the child's birth
certificate as the father and not 1,2,3,4 but 5 years later
decides that she wants to now find out who the child's bio
father is and keep the child away from him. Biodad had to take
biomom to court. Biomom told judge she feels because the child
doesn't know biodad then the biodad should not be able to see
the child and that her and her husband don't want bio-dad in
the childs life because child doesn't know him (please keep in
mind that biodad did not know the child was his because biomom
told him it was her ex boyfriend's child and she was not heard
from again until 5 years later.)

If biomom did not want him involved with the child then biomom
should have kept her mouth shut and left things the way they
were. It's quite obvious that this was only about money. There
is something wicked, malicious and vindictive in trying to
keep a child away from a parent and she waited 5 years later
after biodad moved on with his life and she as well to come
back and reak havoc. Her other actions and other behavior
which I won't get into because that's a whole other chapter
have caused quite a strain on the family including bio-dad's
relationship.

Needless to say biomom now regrets everything she did and is
now saying she should have left things the way they were. Now
biomom wants to stop child support and is asking biodad if she
stop child support will he drop his visitation..(The
Nerve)...again wicked,malicious and vindictive. All of this
mess and drama to go back to where it was originally. Take
care Sharwinston.

On 8/02/07, sharwinston wrote:

Consequences for what? Pursuing support for a child that
> biodad is legally obligated to support? Then, none.
>
> It appears no law was broken. If the DNA test proved the
> man to be biodaddy, as appeas to be the cae, then biodaddy
> has a legal oblgiation to suport his child.
>
> I see nothing wicked, malicious or vindictive about pursuing
> support for a child who is entitled, under the law, to
> support form his biological father. If you are biodad:
> shame on you. If you are the significant other of biodad:
> It's biodad's business.
>
> On 8/01/07, Lez wrote:
>> What are the consequences for a mother after not knowing
>> who the biological father of her child is do the
>> following: get married, change the child's last name to
>> her husband's last name (which he signed)on the birth
>> certificate, five years later decide to get paternity test
>> taken, find the biological father, file for child support
>> and was granted, has two different birth certificates for
>> the child one with her maiden name the other with husbands
>> last name, child support office was given the birth
>> certificate with the maiden name and not the one with the
>> husbands last name....Can someone please assist me with
>> this? I have never heard of such wicked, malicious and
>> vindictive behavior.