Re: Child Support

More | Report Post

Hello Sharwinston,

Again thanks for your response, however your RUDE and
DISRESPECTFUL responses are NOT NECESSARY. It seems as if you have
taken this to a personal level in which I don't understand because
it has not impact you or your family in any way. It's my family
and brother that it has impacted.

I posted to the website merely asking a question(s). In no way was
I expected to recieve this kind of behavior or treatment from you.
Based on your responses to me I'm getting the impression that you
are TRYING to turn this into a combative situation and I WILL NOT
entertain it any further. If that's what you are looking for then
please take it someone else. This is a CHAT BOARD not a COMBATIVE,
SARCASTIC, DISRESPECTFUL and RUDE CHAT BOARD. This website will
not be visted by me again.

P.S.

My fingers are not tired but your unprofessional behavior is.

On 8/04/07, sharwinston wrote:
> Only a court can stop child support and ONLY where the court
> determines that it is in the child's best interst to do so. It
> is only one in a blue moon where child support can be stopped.
>
> Millions of women put a name on the child's birth certificate
> because they do not know or do not want the real father's name
> pbut on the document. POroving they "falsely" did it is nearly
> impossible.
>
> It is a myth that the biological parents can agree amongst
> themselves that biomom will waive child support if biodad will
> waive visitation. Biomom has no such right to waive child
> support. It is the child's right to support from his parents.
>
> I repeat: It is biodad's and biomom's business.
>
> As for the rest of your post: (1) We can agree to disagree.
> (2)You are focusing on the wrong thing, madam. It takes two to
> create the situation. And pointing a finger at only one of the
> two will only get you a tired finger.
>
> On 8/03/07, Lez wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Sharwinston,
>>
>> thanks for your response.
>>
>> Consequences for providing the child support office with a
>> null and voided birth certificate with her maiden name listed
>> as child's last name and not with the birth certificate where
>> the child has the last name of her husband's and signature of
>> husband listed as the child's bio-father.
>>
>> I understand that as biodad he is legally responsible for
>> taking care of the child. I agree with you 100 percent.
>> However, and my apologies for not including this prior. Biomom
>> decided to place un-biodad (husband) on the child's birth
>> certificate as the father and not 1,2,3,4 but 5 years later
>> decides that she wants to now find out who the child's bio
>> father is and keep the child away from him. Biodad had to take
>> biomom to court. Biomom told judge she feels because the child
>> doesn't know biodad then the biodad should not be able to see
>> the child and that her and her husband don't want bio-dad in
>> the childs life because child doesn't know him (please keep in
>> mind that biodad did not know the child was his because biomom
>> told him it was her ex boyfriend's child and she was not heard
>> from again until 5 years later.)
>>
>> If biomom did not want him involved with the child then biomom
>> should have kept her mouth shut and left things the way they
>> were. It's quite obvious that this was only about money. There
>> is something wicked, malicious and vindictive in trying to
>> keep a child away from a parent and she waited 5 years later
>> after biodad moved on with his life and she as well to come
>> back and reak havoc. Her other actions and other behavior
>> which I won't get into because that's a whole other chapter
>> have caused quite a strain on the family including bio-dad's
>> relationship.
>>
>> Needless to say biomom now regrets everything she did and is
>> now saying she should have left things the way they were. Now
>> biomom wants to stop child support and is asking biodad if she
>> stop child support will he drop his visitation..(The
>> Nerve)...again wicked,malicious and vindictive. All of this
>> mess and drama to go back to where it was originally. Take
>> care Sharwinston.
>>
>>
>> On 8/02/07, sharwinston wrote:
>>
>> Consequences for what? Pursuing support for a child that
>>> biodad is legally obligated to support? Then, none.
>>>
>>> It appears no law was broken. If the DNA test proved the
>>> man to be biodaddy, as appeas to be the cae, then biodaddy
>>> has a legal oblgiation to suport his child.
>>>
>>> I see nothing wicked, malicious or vindictive about pursuing
>>> support for a child who is entitled, under the law, to
>>> support form his biological father. If you are biodad:
>>> shame on you. If you are the significant other of biodad:
>>> It's biodad's business.
>>>
>>> On 8/01/07, Lez wrote:
>>>> What are the consequences for a mother after not knowing
>>>> who the biological father of her child is do the
>>>> following: get married, change the child's last name to
>>>> her husband's last name (which he signed)on the birth
>>>> certificate, five years later decide to get paternity test
>>>> taken, find the biological father, file for child support
>>>> and was granted, has two different birth certificates for
>>>> the child one with her maiden name the other with husbands
>>>> last name, child support office was given the birth
>>>> certificate with the maiden name and not the one with the
>>>> husbands last name....Can someone please assist me with
>>>> this? I have never heard of such wicked, malicious and
>>>> vindictive behavior.