Re: ABA v non-ABA law degree
Posted by Hadi on 9/02/04
On 9/02/04, Hadi wrote: Greetings;I have a non ABA degree and i find it quite diffcult in our legal system.I have been looking for a position for three months.I think i will go to immigration law and work for myself.What do you fellow non-ABA and ABA think? > On 7/09/04, possibly perpetual patent agent wrote: >> On 7/09/04, cc wrote: >>> I have a BEE, MSEE and JD (Tier 2) with USPTO registration >>> and state bar. I have been looking for entry level work for >>> over a year with no success. Unlike engineering, the law is >>> EXTREMELY FLOODED with an OVERSUPPLY of highly qualified >>> candidates so law firms like to place games with pedigree, >>> class rank, etc. Most firms are cherry picking from top > 25&37; >>> grads from top 10 law schools. A non-ABA JD is a BIG black >>> mark on your record, but if you have some experience as a >>> patent agent there may be some hope for you. >>> >>> Where did you work as a patent agent? Your best bet is to >>> seek patent attorney opportunities with a firm that you have >>> worked with in the past. >> >> I think you are right. >> >> I have 4 years of experience as a patent agent in both industry >> and law firms (chemistry/pharmaceutical). I have a doctorate > in >> Cell Biology. I am getting lots of interviews for patent agent >> positions because of my experience. >> >> Like you say, there is a real stigma about having a degree from >> a non-ABA school. In other words when viewed from my present >> credentials I am highly competetive. However, with a non-ABA > JD >> I am viewed as non-competetive in the light of all the first >> tier law school graduates. So I do not bring it up. > Especially >> since I get such a negative reaction from putative employers. >> Frankly, it actually does negate my excellant credentials as an >> agent. >> >> Quite honestly, I believe that my non-ABA law school provides a >> fine education (but what do I know). However, it is too much >> work if it doesnt get one to one's career goal. Very > depressing. >> >> You seem to be correct in your analysis and I very much >> appreciate your response.
|