Re: MBNA, Wolpoff & Abramson, National Arbitration Forum

More | Report Post

You are in trouble. Please read my story located on the web
as "The ELeanor Schiano Story". Wolpoff and Abramson own this
account. Contact me if you have questions.
Eleanor

> I entered into a credit management program in August of 2006 due
> to child-custody proceedings that brought about extensive legal
> fees and debt. In January of 2007 I was contacted by my credit
> management company, who told me that Wolpoff & Abramson has made a
> settlement offer. We began negotiating the offer for me to pay
> approximately $200 per month. In January of 2007, I was contacted
> by Wolpoff & Abramson, who had someone serve paperwork (left at my
> door step) with notification that a claim has been filed with the
> NAF. Following this, the settlement offer was increased and
> Wolpoff & Abramson refused to return calles and respond to emails
> left to them by my credit management company. I responded to the
> notification from NAF and showed this matter to be frivilous in
> nature, and that Wolpoff & Abramson was making an unnecessary
> claim against me. In July 07, the NAF ruled in favor of Wolpoff &
> Abramson. What should I do to fight this decision? I do have
> prove of all transactions and communications with MNBA, Wolpoff &
> Abramson, and the NAF. Please Respond ASAP
>
>
> On 3/11/07, stephen ballas wrote:
>> On 2/12/07, John W. Gibson wrote:
>>> Checking PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) I
>>> found a number of lawsuits against Wolpoff & Abramson under the
>>> Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In fact, I recently filed
>>> one on behalf of a client in Pennsylvania state court. I
>> prefer
>>> state to federal court.
>>>
>>> The MBNA arbitration clause in the opinion of at least one
>> court
>>> does not apply if you sue Wolpoff & Abramson because you did
>> not
>>> agree to arbitrate with Wolpoff & Abramson. Wolpoff & Abramson
>>> may have some connection with the National Arbitration Forum
>>> there are a lot of allegations on the internet about this. If
>>> you're in Pennsylvania, call me at (412) 471-7785 and I'll be
>>> happy to discuss the case with you without any charge.
>>
>>
>> It stands to reason. The paperwork that has been submitted in a
>> matter I am involved with is typical of attorneys or those
>> claiming to be attorneys qualified in the state in which the
>> practice of law is being engaged in by these individuals.
>>
>> For instance, the arbitration case was handled by a attorney of
>> the Wolpolff association of legal firms (as their letterhead
>> indicates) from Maryland. Then, the award issued by
>> the "neutral" arbitrator picked by MBNA or NAF then proceeded to
>> an enforcement in the State Court system of California. The
>> attorneys changed without any substitution of attorney
>> notification. Further, the new filing substitutes an entity FIA
>> Card Services, N.A. for MBNA as the moving party without any
>> allegations of the permissibility of so doing.
>>
>> It's a plethora of mistakes and unlawful activity too numerous
>> to for just this communication. I'm taking it further against
>> them. Any assistance would be appreciated.