Re: Response to Conanylizer
Posted by sharwinston on 5/02/09
Neither your nor I know any lawyer that has received "millions to do something about this problem." The only problem is the one you are pontificating about -- and badly. No attorney in the State of California owes you anything. And, assuming arguendo, this were an issue in California, no attorney in the State of California should be expected to work for free on this de minimis issue that you have apparently devoted your life to. So, Tipping-Pool-George, why don't you get off you A#@ & do something about your perceived injustice instead of looking to someone else to do it for you. I repeat my question: Why don't Y-O-U "do something about this problem?" Don't have an answer? I thought so! On 5/01/09, George wrote: > You lawyers have been paid millions to do something about this problem. Look at > all the cases employers have brought against their employers for forced tip > pooling. Why do the cases continue? DO you intentionally sabatoge the cases so > you'll get more? Why are the lawyers who have been hired by employee not > challenge the court's contention that California labor code does not prohibit > employer mandated tip pooling. IF you read the law, it is quite clear that it > prohbits employers from taking tips away from an employee who has received a > tip. When employers mandate tip pooling, tips must be taken from an employee if > they are going to be shared or pooled with others. There can be no excuse that > the employee has waived his rights to keep his tips when he took the job due to > the fact that the law was passed for public reason and in such cases one cannot > waive his or her rights. > > On 4/28/09, sharwinston wrote: >> Why don't Y-O-U do something about it?? -- You seem to have plenty of time >> on your hands the past decade to pursue your obsession about this nobody- >> cares-topic. >> >> >> On 4/28/09, George wrote: >>> Now would you lawyers please do something to correct this injustice.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip. , 1/27/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 2/03/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 2/09/09, by Terry.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 3/11/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 3/12/09, by lawguy.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/05/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/05/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/05/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/05/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/06/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/08/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/08/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/15/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/22/09, by Conanalizer.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/22/09, by George.
- Re: Customer's right to determine who is entitled to his tip, 4/22/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/22/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/22/09, by Conanalizer.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/23/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/25/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/27/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/27/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/27/09, by sharwinsotn.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/28/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 4/28/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/01/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/02/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/03/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/07/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/19/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/19/09, by Chewtoy.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/20/09, by George.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/23/09, by sharwinston.
- Re: Response to Conanylizer, 5/24/09, by v.
- Re: Response to v, 5/27/09, by George.
- Re: Response to v, 5/30/09, by sharwinston.
|