Re: Response to Conanylizer

More | Report Post

On 5/19/09, George wrote:
> The injustice of the situation is, when an employee
> receives a tip from a customer, his employer is now
> able to take the tip away from him with the excuse
> that it might have been intended for someone else.
>
> Imagine someone stealing what another person has
> given you and when you go before a judge, the judge
> looks you straight in the eye and says "what was given
> you wasn't intended for you, therefore I must rule
> in favor of the party who took what was given you....

We're back to the reasoned debate phase. What happened, your meds kick in? Get a
revised 'script?

1. Property is often taken in court from those to whom it was given. Visit bankruptcy
or family court to see property taken away.... All the time. You're an idiot for not
knowing this, George.

2. You want a lawsuit over every tip (you idiot!)? That's why no one (no judge, not us)
care about who wanted to give you (or anyone) any particular tip. We need a general
rule. The courts have agreed the general rule is: almost no one cares who they tip. So,
even if a particular tip was given to you, fk you, it goes into the pool.

Want to jump to insults? Am I part of the conspiracy? Go fkursf. I ain't seen a dime
from you, and you're not getting anything else.

To all other non-George posters: sorry for responding; Chewtoy out.