Re: Daughters Employment
Posted by Nikki on 9/03/07
Ok, all that is fine. Maybe this person knows they don't have a case,
but just wanted to hear it secondhand, which is the situation more
often than not. But, a simple "you don't have a case" would have been
sufficient. No need in name calling. And if "Mudge" wants to be taken
seriously, don't act twelve!
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by Curmudgeon.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/01/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/02/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/02/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/03/07, by v.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/04/07, by Mike.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/04/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/04/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/06/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/06/07, by v.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/06/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by Nikki.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by sharwinston.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by v.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/07/07, by Unreal.
- Re: Daughters Employment, 9/08/07, by v.
|
1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.