ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Due Process Chatboard


Hot Now...
• Attorney Chat Center
• Attorney Classifieds
• Attorney Chatboards
• Practice Areas
• Law Students
Most Popular
• Set Your Quick Links
• Chat Center
• All Chatboards
• Classified Ads

Re: Driver Surcharge-Texas Transportation Code Ch.708
Posted by the founding fathers on 10/04/08

    On 8/17/05, M'sta Mikey wrote:
    > On 8/17/05, Ozarks Lawyer wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> Yet another case of someone getting cheddar instead of brie in
    >> the free-cheese line. Bring back the Post-It Notes, I say.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    > To Mike :
    >
    > If you keep yourself out of trouble, don't drink and drive, don't
    > drive on a suspended license, etc., you have nothing to worry about!
    > Should that be the case, the law wouldn't pertain to you and is
    > therefore a non-issue.
    >
    > Case closed! NNNNNNNNNNNNNNEXT!


    To the author of "The rights of others or the non-issue rights"
    Mike, I belive

    Mike, As a victim of the Texas surcharge law, among others, Im
    offended that you would turn away from lending support to someone
    whos government is making a very non-comical joke out of the very
    documents that constitute its independence. The Bill of rights spells
    out our most basic rights that We as Americans are BORN with, you do
    not have to earn those basic rights, as you aparently have. I can say
    though that picking away at the wording, or re-defining words within
    paragraphs, or even claiming that reguardless of the words written,
    that the framers of the sacred documents, meant something different
    than what they so carfully collaborated upon. You surely could care
    less since you didnt actually contribute to those documents, or fight
    in Americas battle for independence, so nothing of yours has been
    lost. I may be wrong about this but, Mike, You wouldnt happen to be a
    cop now would you? If not theyd probably hire you, due to your
    unbridled conformity, and dedication to whatever theyd like you
    dedicated to.
    The problem, outside of that silly little unconstitutionality issue,
    is out of concern for you Mike, because if you stand by and let them
    ban cigarettes, cause you dont smoke, or force good drivers to buy
    auto insurance, because your reckless and think that if the
    government requires it that it must be something you could never live
    without, then excercise your hatrack on this. Youve allowed a legal
    precedent to occur. You didnt complain the first 5 times they
    deflowered the bill of rights, that means that you have no problem
    with that, so now its your turn. theyve just passed a law forbiding
    any and all sissies named Nancy from wearing pink lacey panties while
    in their cruiser or on duty. Worst of all for you theyve redfined the
    spelling of Nancy as follows: M I K E

    Is it really OK to make poverty a crime becase you dont live in
    poverty

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.