Re: Driver Surcharge-Texas Transportation Code Ch.708

More | Report Post

On 8/17/05, M'sta Mikey wrote:
> On 8/17/05, Ozarks Lawyer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yet another case of someone getting cheddar instead of brie in
>> the free-cheese line. Bring back the Post-It Notes, I say.
>>
>>
>>
>
> To Mike :
>
> If you keep yourself out of trouble, don't drink and drive, don't
> drive on a suspended license, etc., you have nothing to worry about!
> Should that be the case, the law wouldn't pertain to you and is
> therefore a non-issue.
>
> Case closed! NNNNNNNNNNNNNNEXT!

To the author of "The rights of others or the non-issue rights"
Mike, I belive

Mike, As a victim of the Texas surcharge law, among others, Im
offended that you would turn away from lending support to someone
whos government is making a very non-comical joke out of the very
documents that constitute its independence. The Bill of rights spells
out our most basic rights that We as Americans are BORN with, you do
not have to earn those basic rights, as you aparently have. I can say
though that picking away at the wording, or re-defining words within
paragraphs, or even claiming that reguardless of the words written,
that the framers of the sacred documents, meant something different
than what they so carfully collaborated upon. You surely could care
less since you didnt actually contribute to those documents, or fight
in Americas battle for independence, so nothing of yours has been
lost. I may be wrong about this but, Mike, You wouldnt happen to be a
cop now would you? If not theyd probably hire you, due to your
unbridled conformity, and dedication to whatever theyd like you
dedicated to.
The problem, outside of that silly little unconstitutionality issue,
is out of concern for you Mike, because if you stand by and let them
ban cigarettes, cause you dont smoke, or force good drivers to buy
auto insurance, because your reckless and think that if the
government requires it that it must be something you could never live
without, then excercise your hatrack on this. Youve allowed a legal
precedent to occur. You didnt complain the first 5 times they
deflowered the bill of rights, that means that you have no problem
with that, so now its your turn. theyve just passed a law forbiding
any and all sissies named Nancy from wearing pink lacey panties while
in their cruiser or on duty. Worst of all for you theyve redfined the
spelling of Nancy as follows: M I K E

Is it really OK to make poverty a crime becase you dont live in
poverty