Re: Harassment and Defamation on the Internet

More | Report Post

Ms Blake,

Thank you for your input. Comments are always welcome that are
presented courteously and in a truthful manner. With that said,
you appear to have misrepresented the truth in your comments,
and there are several points I’d like to note.

First, you seem unusually bitter, vengeful, and obsessed with
outrage.
No doubt, one would feel the same if there was a legitimate
claim that Toyota was ignoring, or that a serious wrong had been
done to them. In your case, it doesn't seem any sort of serious
wrong has happened, in fact your comments speak more to those of
a seriously narcissistic individual.
Could your vivid imagination about perceived wrongs against you
be what is fueling this fire within you?
Do you feel someone, some thing, or even Toyota has wronged you,
cheated you out of something owed you, or witheld something that
you were entitled to?
Can you document and verify these incidents or individuals you
claim have harmed you?
Is it asking too much of you to level with us about your
experiences, your insistence on being so dreadfully wronged, and
briefly explain why your claims of defamation and other heinous
deeds by others is such a hot issue for you.

You also seem to have a singularly biased and alarmingly
rhetorical manner in presentating your "facts", and in stating
your case against others for their misdeeds, imagined or
otherwise.

Specifically, (1) your comments often infer there are a much
greater number of problems being "hidden"; (2) that the
manufacturer has in some way used “loopholes” to limit its
financial obligations; (3) There are just a few individuals bent
on discrediting you through the use of a variety of devious
schemes; and (4) unexplained and mysterious events, ie hacking,
use of viruses, etc., have caused entire websites with your
comments in them to disappear into cyberspace, and so on.
Beyond that, you all but name Toyota in a conspiracy theory to
sabotage the online petition you have apparently created.

Since inquiring minds would be interested to know what you know,
could you please enlighten as to facts and evidence to support
and explain these loopholes, sabotage, and subterfuge
of which you write.
Your sources would be invaluable in allowing others to
objectively judge the veracity of your claims.

Thanks for posting and many of us look forward to your
comments on these questions.

DJN

On 3/30/07, Charlene Blake wrote:
> Interesting totally subjective post---full of intentional spin
> and untruths, I might add.
>
> If you truly did research my postings, you will find auto
> consumer-oriented postings which are chock full of resources
> for Toyota owners who have been affected by engine oil sludge.
>
> My post here has to do with the legal issues surrounding the
> cyberstalking. I am not complaining; evidence of defamation
is
> abundant.
>
> Apparently, you aren't accurately researching the Toyota
sludge
> matter. I have never posted defamatory posts about anyone nor
> will I ever. I am an auto consumer advocate who champions
> those who wish to speak up about major vehicle problems (in
> this case Toyota) that may be widespread in scope.
>
> The cyberstalkers I am referring to always use pseudonyms or
> anonymous postings to do the damage. I have always included
my
> full name along with links for owners to use to document their
> vehicle cases.
>
> The cyberstalker(s) isn't very clever. Clues have been left
> which can be helpful in tracking their identity(ies).
>
> I have a life, thank you. That life include the freedom to
> speak up about vehicle problems that are far more widespread
> than an automaker reveals.
>
> My work is based on objective data revealed by Toyota owners'
> experiences. Must hit a raw chord for you, eh?
>
> Charlene Blake
> Toyota Owners Unite for Resolution
>
> On 3/28/07, Roger Francis wrote:
>> Dear Ms. Blake:
>>
>> When it comes to cyberstalking, I don't think you are in any
>> position to complain. I googled your email address and came
>> up with several thousand hits. You have "cyberstalked" (your
>> terms, not mine)countless individuals on virtually hundreds
>> of sites, for several years.
>> When someone like you appears that often, and complains
>> continually about what seems to be a personal grudge against
>> one automaker, along with criticism of anyone who challenges
>> your statements, what do you expect??
>> If you can dish it out, you have to be able to deal with the
>> push back. Evidently you can't. Whining about those who
>> don't agree with you won't get sympathy from myself, and
>> undoubtedly most other folks who read similar pathetic
>> moaning from anyone!!
>> It is clear you are the kind of individual who always blames
>> others for your problems.
>> My advice--get a life!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/11/07, Charlene Blake wrote:
>>> I have been doing auto consumer work for the past decade.
>>> Since my involvement in the Toyota engine oil sludge (well
>>> documented by journalists, consumer agencies, and Toyota
>>> owners) matter, some who are attempting to protect the
>>> automaker have continued to harass, intimidate, and defame
>>> me publicly.
>>>
>>> The hope is that the distraction and confusion will coax
>>> auto consumers to reject my consumer information. I
>>> believe the intent is to diminish and/or end the public
>>> dialogue about this serious engine problem and to limit
>> the
>>> effectiveness of my consumer networking.
>>>
>>> What measures can be taken in such cases? My name as an
>>> advocate is out there, but I am not a public figure in the
>>> true sense. What legal measures are available to me?
>>>
>>> The "cyberstalker(s)" have used aliases and even posed as
>>> me in order to discredit. One in particular lives in
>>> Canada and uses Sprint for his internet access. He
>>> impersonated me on a private blog, and the "owner" of the
>>> blog revealed this information publicly.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your input.
>>>
>>> Charlene Blake
>>> cblake@erols.com
>>> Toyota Owners Unite for Resolution
>>> http://www.petitiononline.com/TMC2003/petition.html