Re: Harassment and Defamation on the Internet

More | Report Post

ADVICE FOR CHARLENE BLAKE

MS. BLAKE, you received the best legal advice possible the other
day from one of the readers of this forum.
FRANKLY, you are the author of your own misfortune through a
bizarre obssession with this sludge issue (long since extinct
BTW), and your continued fantasizing about subterfuge and
heinous plots against you by others.
Madame, you are the problem, and you alone have the solution in
your hands.
You were informed that there isn't much you can do about
comments (unpleasant as you may think) directed at you in
response to your adolescent whinings.
YOU HAVE PUT YOURSELF IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN, THEREFORE YOU ARE
COMPLETELY OPEN TO PUBLIC CRITICISM IN ALL ITS FORMS!!
The reason for your lack of legal recourse is , essentially,
because there isn't any merit for it. You were informed why
this is; the question now is " What don't you understand about
the word NO??"
At this juncture, you don't seem willing or capable of
recognizing where the problem really lies.
SO HERE'S SOME MORE ADVICE:
People who act like fools will generally be treated accordingly.
The best (and only) recourse open to you if you find reaction to
your presence unpleasant is for you to just stop the insanity
and shut up!!
TRY IT--GUARANTEED IT WILL SOLVE YOUR PROBLEM!!
YOU, YOURSELF ARE THE PROBLEM!! WAKE UP!!

On 4/05/07, Charlene Blake wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Dave Nightingale wrote:
>> Response To Charlene Blake:
>>
>> You posted this same information on many other websites,
>> including different forums on this site.
>> The administrator on onother forum called you to account for
>> your remarks, yet you have not responded. I wonder why?
>> Just to rmind you of the questions asked by that individual,
>> the following is a copy. It would be interesting to know
>> your answers to what I believe are worthy questions--as
>> follows:
>
> "Mr. Nightingale," please cite the administrator's name and
the
> website here. I have no idea why you are posting this here or
> what it has to do with my request for legal information. I
> don't know who you are or what your strong interest in my
> consumer efforts might be. It would appear that you are
> opposed to the Toyota owner networking and are concerned about
> what information might come from this networking.
>
> Toyota's major engine problem, a.k.a. ENGINE OIL SLUDGE, is
> well-known and well-published (see Toyota engine oil sludge
> class action lawsuit or any such keyword online search). I am
> certain you aren't here to dispute this fact.
>
> I am not on trial. However, Toyota would have been had it not
> chosen instead to settle the class action lawsuit in February
> of this year. Perhaps you are not up on all this? It would
be
> helpful if you cite these things which might help Toyota
owners
> as they grapple with the very serious nature of the engine
> problem. All Toyota owners should file online reports with
the
> Center for Auto Safety and the National Highway Traffic Safety
> Administration. Toyota needs to receive a CERTIFIED letter
> from Toyota owners in order to add to the automaker's
> database. Toyota has cited this problem to be "very small"
but
> it has not updated the complaint number since 2002.
>
> I would ask that you HELP auto consumers rather than hinder
> them. Attacking a petition where they choose to post isn't
> beneficial. Seeking to stop consumer organizers isn't
prudent,
> is it?