Re: Harassment and Defamation on the Internet

More | Report Post

First, your posts all seem very bitter. They also seem to indicate
you have disturbing illusions re imagined issues.
Perhaps the same might apply to some having sludge claims,
nevertheless your very frequent rants are alarmingly spiteful to the
point of being obsessive.
Do you have a sludge problem? Do you really believe people are
stalking you?
Could these be what is fueling the fire within you? Do you feel
Toyota or anyone else has cheated you out of something it owed you?
Why do you get so upset and defensive when others question your
intentions or your integrity (It does seem suspect at times, ie,
your many previous posts are examples) Would you please be so kind
as to level with readers about your experiences, your involvement
with your petition, and those countless rants around the net, and
briefly explain why this is such a hot issue for you?
Second, you seem to have a singular tunnel vision-like view of the
facts that are presented in your rhetoric – quite unlike the views
one gets from reading many other sources of information on this
topic... (1) your comments always infer there are a greater number
of vehicles out there with problems that Toyota; (2) that the
manufacturer has in some way used “loopholes” to limit its financial
exposure; (3) There is a secret (yet unproven) conspiracy to defraud
the public; and (4) Your incessant veiled inferences claiming
someone is obsessed with "cyberstalking" you ad infinitum.
Beyond that, you all but name Toyota in a conspiracy theory to
sabotage the online petition drive, and frequently allege that
Toyota has on a number of occasions, deliberately sabotaged many
other sites dealing with your campaigns.Since many would love to
know what you know, could you please reference your sources of
information alluding to vast numbers of "defective" vehicles, and
more specifically, verify and explain the loopholes and sabotage of
which you write. Your co-operation would be invaluable in allowing
readers to objectively weigh the facts.

On 4/16/07, Charlene Blake wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Charlene Blake wrote:
>> Mr. Coristine, you might want to check the Jeff Liquia blog
>
> CORRECTION: That site should be the Jeff Licquia blog.
>
> Charlene Blake
> cblake@erols.com