Re: National Arbitration Forum

More | Report Post

On 5/21/07, James J wrote:
> Geee, Cockroach! The NEW agency wants to work with me, go figur'! It's the
> OLD agency that served me a summons and it is no different than any other
> summons that is served in that it requires an answer, from me, to the
> plaintiff and the court. If the arbitration award, by NAF, the paid dupes of
> the "agency" was valid, why would I be getting a summons for superior court?
> Wouldn't it be a slam dunk for the plaintiff???
>
> I would say that by my replying to this complaint it most certainly is giving
> me the opportunity to contest this amount and in a legitimate way and not
> hoping that I would have been one of the 1&37; that gets an honest opinion from
> NAF.
>
> On 5/21/07, Curmudgeon wrote:
>> Wrong again, Grasshopper. The new agency is now seeking to get a wage
>> garnishment or asset attachment order from a court to enforce the already
>> valid arbitration award. You no longer have any opportunity to contest
>> the amount or validity of the arbitration award. Now you just get to pay
>> it.
>>