Click here
ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Second Amendment Chatboard

Re: Denied Illinois FOID card
Posted by SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS on 2/26/08

    That’s interesting, I think you are right; Illinois is violating the Illinois States constitution. Foid Cards are un-
    constitutional.

    On 2/21/08, RIGHT TO ARMS wrote:
    > SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS
    > Subject only to the police power, the right of the
    > Individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
    > (Source: Illinois Constitution.) That is straight forward to me as I read the Illinois constitution “Individual
    > citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” Foid cards do exactly that, infringe an individual’s right.
    >
    > On 1/16/08, Captain America wrote:
    >> I am mainly talking about the Illinois Constitution. The State of Illinois adopted the Federal constitution by
    >> vote, so they must follow it, until they have a re- vote not to. And the Illinois constitution states this.
    >> SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS
    >> Subject only to the police power, the right of the
    >> Individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
    >> (Source: Illinois Constitution.)
    >>
    >>
    >>>
    >>> No problem Captain America, you don't sound mean at all you just sound kind of frustrated that not everyone
    >>> agrees with you. As for your suggestion that people who disagree with you should leave the country; well --
    >>> that is not a comment that deserves a respectful answer. All I can say is -- you need to understand that your
    >>> opinion is not what counts, it is the opinion of the Supreme Court which was established by Article III of the
    >>> Constitution. The Constitution you are waving around gave the Supreme Court the power to interpret the
    >>> Constitution. If you don’t like that part of the Constitution you should seek an amendment that would put you
    >>> in charge.
    >>>
    >>> According to currently applicable Supreme Court holdings, the Constitution does not guarantee that a citizen
    >>> may own a firearm. What the Constitution does do is prohibit the federal government from interfering with the
    >>> states' right to allow its citizens to own a firearm. The states have the right to allow or prohibit their
    >>> own citizens from owning firearms as they see fit without interference from the federal government.
    >>>
    >>> You should follow a current case before the US Supreme Court. “D.C. v. Heller” is a case where the 2nd
    >>> Circuit struck down the DC ban on gun ownership as unconstitutional. The 2nd circuit agrees with your
    >>> interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. The case will be heard this term by the Supreme Court. Their decision
    >>> will put to rest the question of whether the 2nd Amendment is a state right or a personal right. By following
    >>> this case you will become informed about the issues involved.

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.