ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Second Amendment Chatboard

Re: Denied Illinois FOID card
Posted by Happy on 5/25/08

    I think that sounds like a good idea; I am a bit frightened by Deputy’s with guns, which have mental issues. If this Deputy Jim Hite has signs of
    distress, sure why not send him to a doctor.

    On 5/18/08, Larry wrote:
    > Thats scary Hite has a gun.
    >
    >
    > On 3/19/08, Concerned wrote:
    >> Concerned also, Deputy Jim Hite should have to go to a certified doctor at least every three months to have an evaluation from a medical doctor
    >> saying he is mentally stable enough to carry a firearm. I really don’t think that’s too much to ask from our city council for safety to the
    >> community, to make this a requirement of him, or any officer who acts in such way that is hostile, or could be a threat to anyone in that
    >> community. I am concerned with officers that carry guns, especially when the Coles county sheriffs department is so close to a university and
    >> high school where teenagers and children go to school. Just because he’s a deputy, doesn’t mean he should carry a firearm, he’s only human. I
    >> have read articles on the Internet about a lot of different deputy’s going on rampages with their guns and it scares me. This should be a
    > concern
    >> to mothers in the area with children or teenagers.
    >>
    >> On 3/14/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
    >>> I went to court yesterday about getting my firearms back and for the seizure of them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois
    >>> constitution says you must have to seize anyone’s property. Well I fought it myself without a lawyer. Lawyers want over a $1000 dollars to
    >>> start your case and the two firearms I owned for 15 years that had never been fired were worth about $500. Judge James R Glenn work buddy of
    >>> Judge Mitchell K Shick would not return them, or he wouldn’t even look at my evidence that I had brought in to court showing the truth. This
    >>> was a case against the Coles county Sheriffs department for violating several laws. The whole case lasted about 12 minutes, and he awarded me
    >>> nothing and gave the Sheriffs my guns for their use, end of story. In other words they stole my firearms from me, Illegally seized my firearms
    >>> and was supposed to return them after two years by law. These judges swore to protect and defend the constitution and laws. Well I saw nothing
    >>> of the sort, they basically do what ever they want to people at the Coles county court system, legally, or illegally and theirs no one to stop
    >>> them except the FBI, who do take down these kind of crimes once in awhile. I am tired of fighting a justice system that dose not comply with
    >>> the laws, it’s a no win situation under those unfair rules. My experience and opinion of the Coles County Sheriffs department Illinois, the
    >>> front desk girls are nice and I meet three other officers who were nice and in control and a pleasure to talk to officer Fisher and Officer
    >>> Saunders, really good officers that care about the public, but one officer I had to deal with was detective HITE and he was always yelling at
    >>> me telling me to set down like I am some juvenile, I’m a grown man and he treated me like a juvenile, he really gave me the impression that he
    >>> was a stick of dynamite ready to explode and start to shooting his gun at me if I said or did the wrong thing; I hope I never see that man
    >>> again, he scares me; and I shouldn’t have to be scarred of a public servant. I wish they would send him for evaluation and maybe to anger
    >>> management, combined in a class on how to be nice to the public but no one will do anything about it, until he dose something everyone will
    >>> regret. I wouldn’t fire him, or take his gun away, just send him for evaluation to a doctor, for public safety concerns. Here’s another Coles
    >>> county crook in action read about it at this website. http://www.jg-tc.com/articles/2008/03/13/news/doc47d98a6cb3a16365099618.txt
    >>>
    >>> Everything I type on this website are my point of view of my case and, or my opinions and reviews of this case, or persons involved.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 3/13/08, ASTRO wrote:
    >>>> The police can’t make a decision about your mental state, only a court can do that; you need to seek legal council.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 3/12/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
    >>>>> I was told by the Illinois State police that they declined my FOID card because the Coles county Sheriffs department used information
    >>>>> apparently from my divorce case two years ago; Information my wife lied about in court with no proof and that I was posting things on
    >>>>> these types of websites they felt was confirming my mental state. I went back and read everything I have wrote and I see nothing any where
    >>>>> that I threaten anyone or shows I am crazy, lots of people post stuff. I have been posting things about my views on the Illinois Laws and
    >>>>> the constitution, why is that a crime now in Illinois anyone know? One other thing my firearms had never been fired, owned them for 15
    >>>>> years, no criminal record anywhere in the world, also I have no mental recorded stating I am crazy, nor a court saying it. The sheriffs
    >>>>> department seized them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois Constitution states you need. What’s going on here anyone know? I
    >>>>> do know this deputy sheriff doesn’t like me, and he’s the one who compiled the information to send to the State Police. Its not the
    >>>>> Illinois State polices fault there just doing their job with Information they got from this Deputy sheriff that is playing medical doctor
    >>>>> and judge on the side..
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 3/01/08, Illinois wrote:
    >>>>>> Illinois is the leader in taking away your rights. What’s next, will Illinois demand you put the 666 chips under skin for idefication
    >>>>> and
    >>>>>> tracking purposes? My opinion as I look at what Illinois legislators are trying to do is break Illinois away from the constitution and
    >>>>>> the United States to form their own little country. Illinois makes you have a licenses for everything, fishing, hunting, drivers,
    >>>>>> firearms, etc, they also make grown adults were a seat belt in their own car and if you don’t want to go to jury duty, you go to jail.
    >>>>>> Illinois the communist State love or leave it, I guess. I am trying to leave it and return to the rest of the United States again, where
    >>>>>> state officials follow the constitution.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On 2/29/08, -- wrote:
    >>>>>>> On 2/29/08, Guns wrote:
    >>>>>>>> Anti-gun Bills Poised to be Heard at Any Moment in the Illinois House!
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> In the Illinois State House there are six bills that are aimed at weakening your Second Amendment rights.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> House Bill 731 would expand the current mandatory storage law and make it virtually impossible for law-abiding gun owners to store a
    >>>>>>>> firearm in a way that would leave it readily accessible for self-defense;
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> House Bill 758 would create a virtual ban on the private transfer of firearms;
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> House Bill 796 would create a new state-based licensing bureaucracy for firearm dealers;
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> House Bill 4357 would ban countless semi-automatic firearms and .50 cal. rifles and ammunition;
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> House Bill 4393 would place a limit on the number of handguns an individual may lawfully purchase;
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Finally, Senate Bill 1007 would ban the manufacture, possession, delivery, sale, and purchase of standard capacity ammunition
    >>>>>>>> magazines capable of holding more than ten (10) cartridges. This bill is worded so broadly that it would also ban certain firearms,
    >>>>>>>> such as some Henry rifles, which have attached tubular magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. This lever-
    >>>>>>>> action rifle, whose design dates back to the 1860s, could be prohibited under SB 1007, making this bill far more than a magazine ban.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> If the US Supreme Court decides in favor of Heller in "D.C. v. Heller" the proposed bills you have copied above will be dead in the
    >>>>>>> water whether they pass or not. What these bill try to do is exactly what "Heller" is going to decide.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Here’s the questions presented in Heller:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code §§ 7.2502.02(a)(4) [banning handguns], 22-4504(a) [banning gun carrying, including at
    >>>>>>> home], and 7.2507.02 [requiring all guns to be both unloaded and locked or disassembled] — violate the Second Amendment rights of
    >>>>>>> individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use
    >>>>>>> in their homes?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> (1) Does the Second Amendment protect a right of individuals?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> (2) If so, do individuals enjoy that right regardless of whether they are currently affiliated with a state-regulated militia
    >>>>>>> organization?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> (3) If so, then what purposes, of the various purposes for which individuals may wish to keep or bear arms, are constitutionally
    >>>>>>> protected?
    >>>>>>>

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.