ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Second Amendment Chatboard
Click here

Re: DEPUTY JIM HITE COLES COUNTY ILLINOIS
Posted by -- on 6/16/08

    On 6/16/08, Expert wrote:
    > As far as I know, Jim hite has no college education, but he has watched quite of few cop movies on tv.

    You guys are pitiful. No wonder you carry a rubber gun.



    > On 6/06/08, Razor wrote:
    >> Coles County Illinois Sheriffs department in Charleston Illinois has a deputy of the name of Jim Hite. The man seems to have some serious issues to
    >> the point he scares me since he carries a firearm. My father told me he knows Deputy Hite and knows his wife who he worked with for some 20 years at
    >> General Electric. Deputy Hites wife told him that she was always afraid of her husband, and that he ran around on her with other women. My personal
    >> experience with this deputy took place one day when I asked to talk to the Sheriff Cox, Deputy Jim hite didn’t like that and became angered and
    >> started to yell at me for no reason he also kept telling me to sit down treating me with no respect at all. I felt if I had said the wrong thing to
    >> him, I he might have pulled his gun on me. I hope the Coles sheriff department sends him for evaluation; I think he is a stick of dynamite ready to
    >> explode.
    >>
    >> On 5/25/08, Happy wrote:
    >>> I think that sounds like a good idea; I am a bit frightened by Deputy’s with guns, which have mental issues. If this Deputy Jim Hite has signs of
    >>> distress, sure why not send him to a doctor.
    >>>
    >>> On 5/18/08, Larry wrote:
    >>>> Thats scary Hite has a gun.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 3/19/08, Concerned wrote:
    >>>>> Concerned also, Deputy Jim Hite should have to go to a certified doctor at least every three months to have an evaluation from a medical doctor
    >>>>> saying he is mentally stable enough to carry a firearm. I really don’t think that’s too much to ask from our city council for safety to the
    >>>>> community, to make this a requirement of him, or any officer who acts in such way that is hostile, or could be a threat to anyone in that
    >>>>> community. I am concerned with officers that carry guns, especially when the Coles county sheriffs department is so close to a university and
    >>>>> high school where teenagers and children go to school. Just because he’s a deputy, doesn’t mean he should carry a firearm, he’s only human. I
    >>>>> have read articles on the Internet about a lot of different deputy’s going on rampages with their guns and it scares me. This should be a
    >>>> concern
    >>>>> to mothers in the area with children or teenagers.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 3/14/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
    >>>>>> I went to court yesterday about getting my firearms back and for the seizure of them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois
    >>>>>> constitution says you must have to seize anyone’s property. Well I fought it myself without a lawyer. Lawyers want over a $1000 dollars to
    >>>>>> start your case and the two firearms I owned for 15 years that had never been fired were worth about $500. Judge James R Glenn work buddy of
    >>>>>> Judge Mitchell K Shick would not return them, or he wouldn’t even look at my evidence that I had brought in to court showing the truth. This
    >>>>>> was a case against the Coles county Sheriffs department for violating several laws. The whole case lasted about 12 minutes, and he awarded me
    >>>>>> nothing and gave the Sheriffs my guns for their use, end of story. In other words they stole my firearms from me, Illegally seized my firearms
    >>>>>> and was supposed to return them after two years by law. These judges swore to protect and defend the constitution and laws. Well I saw nothing
    >>>>>> of the sort, they basically do what ever they want to people at the Coles county court system, legally, or illegally and theirs no one to stop
    >>>>>> them except the FBI, who do take down these kind of crimes once in awhile. I am tired of fighting a justice system that dose not comply with
    >>>>>> the laws, it’s a no win situation under those unfair rules. My experience and opinion of the Coles County Sheriffs department Illinois, the
    >>>>>> front desk girls are nice and I meet three other officers who were nice and in control and a pleasure to talk to officer Fisher and Officer
    >>>>>> Saunders, really good officers that care about the public, but one officer I had to deal with was detective HITE and he was always yelling at
    >>>>>> me telling me to set down like I am some juvenile, I’m a grown man and he treated me like a juvenile, he really gave me the impression that he
    >>>>>> was a stick of dynamite ready to explode and start to shooting his gun at me if I said or did the wrong thing; I hope I never see that man
    >>>>>> again, he scares me; and I shouldn’t have to be scarred of a public servant. I wish they would send him for evaluation and maybe to anger
    >>>>>> management, combined in a class on how to be nice to the public but no one will do anything about it, until he dose something everyone will
    >>>>>> regret. I wouldn’t fire him, or take his gun away, just send him for evaluation to a doctor, for public safety concerns. Here’s another Coles
    >>>>>> county crook in action read about it at this website. http://www.jg-tc.com/articles/2008/03/13/news/doc47d98a6cb3a16365099618.txt
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Everything I type on this website are my point of view of my case and, or my opinions and reviews of this case, or persons involved.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On 3/13/08, ASTRO wrote:
    >>>>>>> The police can’t make a decision about your mental state, only a court can do that; you need to seek legal council.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> On 3/12/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
    >>>>>>>> I was told by the Illinois State police that they declined my FOID card because the Coles county Sheriffs department used information
    >>>>>>>> apparently from my divorce case two years ago; Information my wife lied about in court with no proof and that I was posting things on
    >>>>>>>> these types of websites they felt was confirming my mental state. I went back and read everything I have wrote and I see nothing any where
    >>>>>>>> that I threaten anyone or shows I am crazy, lots of people post stuff. I have been posting things about my views on the Illinois Laws and
    >>>>>>>> the constitution, why is that a crime now in Illinois anyone know? One other thing my firearms had never been fired, owned them for 15
    >>>>>>>> years, no criminal record anywhere in the world, also I have no mental recorded stating I am crazy, nor a court saying it. The sheriffs
    >>>>>>>> department seized them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois Constitution states you need. What’s going on here anyone know? I
    >>>>>>>> do know this deputy sheriff doesn’t like me, and he’s the one who compiled the information to send to the State Police. Its not the
    >>>>>>>> Illinois State polices fault there just doing their job with Information they got from this Deputy sheriff that is playing medical doctor
    >>>>>>>> and judge on the side..
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> On 3/01/08, Illinois wrote:
    >>>>>>>>> Illinois is the leader in taking away your rights. What’s next, will Illinois demand you put the 666 chips under skin for idefication
    >>>>>>>> and
    >>>>>>>>> tracking purposes? My opinion as I look at what Illinois legislators are trying to do is break Illinois away from the constitution and
    >>>>>>>>> the United States to form their own little country. Illinois makes you have a licenses for everything, fishing, hunting, drivers,
    >>>>>>>>> firearms, etc, they also make grown adults were a seat belt in their own car and if you don’t want to go to jury duty, you go to jail.
    >>>>>>>>> Illinois the communist State love or leave it, I guess. I am trying to leave it and return to the rest of the United States again, where
    >>>>>>>>> state officials follow the constitution.
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> On 2/29/08, -- wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>> On 2/29/08, Guns wrote:
    >>>>>>>>>>> Anti-gun Bills Poised to be Heard at Any Moment in the Illinois House!
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> In the Illinois State House there are six bills that are aimed at weakening your Second Amendment rights.
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> House Bill 731 would expand the current mandatory storage law and make it virtually impossible for law-abiding gun owners to store a
    >>>>>>>>>>> firearm in a way that would leave it readily accessible for self-defense;
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> House Bill 758 would create a virtual ban on the private transfer of firearms;
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> House Bill 796 would create a new state-based licensing bureaucracy for firearm dealers;
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> House Bill 4357 would ban countless semi-automatic firearms and .50 cal. rifles and ammunition;
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> House Bill 4393 would place a limit on the number of handguns an individual may lawfully purchase;
    >>>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>>> Finally, Senate Bill 1007 would ban the manufacture, possession, delivery, sale, and purchase of standard capacity ammunition
    >>>>>>>>>>> magazines capable of holding more than ten (10) cartridges. This bill is worded so broadly that it would also ban certain firearms,
    >>>>>>>>>>> such as some Henry rifles, which have attached tubular magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. This lever-
    >>>>>>>>>>> action rifle, whose design dates back to the 1860s, could be prohibited under SB 1007, making this bill far more than a magazine ban.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> If the US Supreme Court decides in favor of Heller in "D.C. v. Heller" the proposed bills you have copied above will be dead in the
    >>>>>>>>>> water whether they pass or not. What these bill try to do is exactly what "Heller" is going to decide.
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Here’s the questions presented in Heller:
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code §§ 7.2502.02(a)(4) [banning handguns], 22-4504(a) [banning gun carrying, including at
    >>>>>>>>>> home], and 7.2507.02 [requiring all guns to be both unloaded and locked or disassembled] — violate the Second Amendment rights of
    >>>>>>>>>> individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use
    >>>>>>>>>> in their homes?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> (1) Does the Second Amendment protect a right of individuals?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> (2) If so, do individuals enjoy that right regardless of whether they are currently affiliated with a state-regulated militia
    >>>>>>>>>> organization?
    >>>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>> (3) If so, then what purposes, of the various purposes for which individuals may wish to keep or bear arms, are constitutionally
    >>>>>>>>>> protected?
    >>>>>>>>>>

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.