ATTORNEYS LAW STUDENTS PUBLIC
TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Share | Print | Report Post Second Amendment Chatboard

Re: Denied Illinois FOID card
Posted by Kent on 3/17/08

    I lost my firearms that way, once you give them up, you will never see them again. It makes you wonder if they are making money off them.

    On 3/17/08, lrw wrote:
    > Man they want your gun that’s all, so they can make some money off them; this stuff goes on all over the country.
    >
    > Pennsylvania Attorney General Mike Fisher today announced that a Westmoreland County Deputy Sheriff has been charged with theft for allegedly
    > stealing seized weapons from an evidence locker and selling the guns to an area gun dealer.
    >
    > Fisher said agents of his Bureau of Criminal Investigation have filed criminal charges against Luigi "Gino" Ferrari, 40, of 1xx7 Saybrook Dr.,
    > Greensburg. Ferrari is a Westmoreland County Deputy Sheriff and holds the rank of sergeant.
    >
    > The charges allege that Ferrari, who was in charge of the evidence locker in the Westmoreland County Sheriff's office, falsified documents and
    > stole 15 unclaimed weapons from the locker. He allegedly gave some of the weapons away and sold others on consignment to a local gun dealer. The
    > charges allege Ferrari stole one gun.
    >
    > The charges allege that several of the weapons that Ferrari stole were obtained from individuals who were served with protection from abuse
    > orders (PFA). Fisher explained that when the Sheriff's office served a PFA order they would seize or confiscate weapons or guns from the
    > individual. The weapons were logged in the Sheriff's office and kept in the evidence locker. Upon the expiration of the PFA order, a notice was
    > sent to the individual to claim their weapon within 30 days. If a gun remained unclaimed, a court order to destroy the weapon was to be
    > obtained. The Sheriff's office was supposed to take the weapons to a foundry to be melted.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 3/14/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
    >> I went to court yesterday about getting my firearms back and for the seizure of them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois
    >> constitution says you must have to seize anyone’s property. Well I fought it myself without a lawyer. Lawyers want over a $1000 dollars to
    >> start your case and the two firearms I owned for 15 years that had never been fired were worth about $500. Judge James R Glenn work buddy of
    >> Judge Mitchell K Shick would not return them, or he wouldn’t even look at my evidence that I had brought in to court showing the truth. This
    >> was a case against the Coles county Sheriffs department for violating several laws. The whole case lasted about 12 minutes, and he awarded me
    >> nothing and gave the Sheriffs my guns for their use, end of story. In other words they stole my firearms from me, Illegally seized my
    > firearms
    >> and was supposed to return them after two years by law. These judges swore to protect and defend the constitution and laws. Well I saw nothing
    >> of the sort, they basically do what ever they want to people at the Coles county court system, legally, or illegally and theirs no one to stop
    >> them except the FBI, who do take down these kind of crimes once in awhile. I am tired of fighting a justice system that dose not comply with
    >> the laws, it’s a no win situation under those unfair rules. My experience and opinion of the Coles County Sheriffs department Illinois, the
    >> front desk girls are nice and I meet three other officers who were nice and in control and a pleasure to talk to officer Fisher and Officer
    >> Saunders, really good officers that care about the public, but one officer I had to deal with was detective HITE and he was always yelling at
    >> me telling me to set down like I am some juvenile, I’m a grown man and he treated me like a juvenile, he really gave me the impression that he
    >> was a stick of dynamite ready to explode and start to shooting his gun at me if I said or did the wrong thing; I hope I never see that man
    >> again, he scares me; and I shouldn’t have to be scarred of a public servant. I wish they would send him for evaluation and maybe to anger
    >> management, combined in a class on how to be nice to the public but no one will do anything about it, until he dose something everyone will
    >> regret. I wouldn’t fire him, or take his gun away, just send him for evaluation to a doctor, for public safety concerns. Here’s another Coles
    >> county crook in action read about it at this website. http://www.jg-tc.com/articles/2008/03/13/news/doc47d98a6cb3a16365099618.txt
    >>
    >> Everything I type on this website are my point of view of my case and, or my opinions and reviews of this case, or persons involved.
    >>
    >>
    >> On 3/13/08, ASTRO wrote:
    >>> The police can’t make a decision about your mental state, only a court can do that; you need to seek legal council.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 3/12/08, ILLINOIS wrote:
    >>>> I was told by the Illinois State police that they declined my FOID card because the Coles county Sheriffs department used information
    >>>> apparently from my divorce case two years ago; Information my wife lied about in court with no proof and that I was posting things on
    >>>> these types of websites they felt was confirming my mental state. I went back and read everything I have wrote and I see nothing any where
    >>>> that I threaten anyone or shows I am crazy, lots of people post stuff. I have been posting things about my views on the Illinois Laws and
    >>>> the constitution, why is that a crime now in Illinois anyone know? One other thing my firearms had never been fired, owned them for 15
    >>>> years, no criminal record anywhere in the world, also I have no mental recorded stating I am crazy, nor a court saying it. The sheriffs
    >>>> department seized them without a warrant and affidavit like the Illinois Constitution states you need. What’s going on here anyone know? I
    >>>> do know this deputy sheriff doesn’t like me, and he’s the one who compiled the information to send to the State Police. Its not the
    >>>> Illinois State polices fault there just doing their job with Information they got from this Deputy sheriff that is playing medical doctor
    >>>> and judge on the side..
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 3/01/08, Illinois wrote:
    >>>>> Illinois is the leader in taking away your rights. What’s next, will Illinois demand you put the 666 chips under skin for idefication
    >>>> and
    >>>>> tracking purposes? My opinion as I look at what Illinois legislators are trying to do is break Illinois away from the constitution and
    >>>>> the United States to form their own little country. Illinois makes you have a licenses for everything, fishing, hunting, drivers,
    >>>>> firearms, etc, they also make grown adults were a seat belt in their own car and if you don’t want to go to jury duty, you go to jail.
    >>>>> Illinois the communist State love or leave it, I guess. I am trying to leave it and return to the rest of the United States again, where
    >>>>> state officials follow the constitution.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 2/29/08, -- wrote:
    >>>>>> On 2/29/08, Guns wrote:
    >>>>>>> Anti-gun Bills Poised to be Heard at Any Moment in the Illinois House!
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> In the Illinois State House there are six bills that are aimed at weakening your Second Amendment rights.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> House Bill 731 would expand the current mandatory storage law and make it virtually impossible for law-abiding gun owners to store a
    >>>>>>> firearm in a way that would leave it readily accessible for self-defense;
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> House Bill 758 would create a virtual ban on the private transfer of firearms;
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> House Bill 796 would create a new state-based licensing bureaucracy for firearm dealers;
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> House Bill 4357 would ban countless semi-automatic firearms and .50 cal. rifles and ammunition;
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> House Bill 4393 would place a limit on the number of handguns an individual may lawfully purchase;
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Finally, Senate Bill 1007 would ban the manufacture, possession, delivery, sale, and purchase of standard capacity ammunition
    >>>>>>> magazines capable of holding more than ten (10) cartridges. This bill is worded so broadly that it would also ban certain firearms,
    >>>>>>> such as some Henry rifles, which have attached tubular magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition. This lever-
    >>>>>>> action rifle, whose design dates back to the 1860s, could be prohibited under SB 1007, making this bill far more than a magazine ban.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> If the US Supreme Court decides in favor of Heller in "D.C. v. Heller" the proposed bills you have copied above will be dead in the
    >>>>>> water whether they pass or not. What these bill try to do is exactly what "Heller" is going to decide.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Here’s the questions presented in Heller:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code §§ 7.2502.02(a)(4) [banning handguns], 22-4504(a) [banning gun carrying, including at
    >>>>>> home], and 7.2507.02 [requiring all guns to be both unloaded and locked or disassembled] — violate the Second Amendment rights of
    >>>>>> individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use
    >>>>>> in their homes?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> (1) Does the Second Amendment protect a right of individuals?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> (2) If so, do individuals enjoy that right regardless of whether they are currently affiliated with a state-regulated militia
    >>>>>> organization?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> (3) If so, then what purposes, of the various purposes for which individuals may wish to keep or bear arms, are constitutionally
    >>>>>> protected?
    >>>>>>

     
     

 
Google
 
Web Counsel.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Legal Jobs Classifieds Law Students Contacts Practice Areas Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.